BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27613390)

  • 21. Reducing the search space for causal genetic variants with VASP.
    Field MA; Cho V; Cook MC; Enders A; Vinuesa CG; Whittle B; Andrews TD; Goodnow CC
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(14):2377-9. PubMed ID: 25755272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. PRIMUS: improving pedigree reconstruction using mitochondrial and Y haplotypes.
    Staples J; Ekunwe L; Lange E; Wilson JG; Nickerson DA; Below JE
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):596-8. PubMed ID: 26515822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multivariate and multilocus variance components method, based on structural relationships to assess quantitative trait linkage via SEGPATH.
    Province MA; Rice TK; Borecki IB; Gu C; Kraja A; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 12548674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pedigree reconstruction in wild cichlid fish populations.
    Koch M; Hadfield JD; Sefc KM; Sturmbauer C
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Oct; 17(20):4500-11. PubMed ID: 18986496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contributions of linkage disequilibrium and co-segregation information to the accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Sun X; Fernando R; Dekkers J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):77. PubMed ID: 27729012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Collection of pedigree data for genetic analysis in isolate populations.
    Williams-Blangero S; Blangero J
    Hum Biol; 2006 Feb; 78(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 16900884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The genetic variance for multiple linked quantitative trait loci conditional on marker information in a crossed population.
    Matsuda H; Iwaisaki H
    Heredity (Edinb); 2002 Jan; 88(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 11813099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating power and type 1 error in large pedigree analyses of binary traits.
    Cummings AC; Torstenson E; Davis MF; D'Aoust LN; Scott WK; Pericak-Vance MA; Bush WS; Haines JL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e62615. PubMed ID: 23658753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How many individuals share a mitochondrial genome?
    Andersen MM; Balding DJ
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1007774. PubMed ID: 30383746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. GenoMatrix: A Software Package for Pedigree-Based and Genomic Prediction Analyses on Complex Traits.
    Nazarian A; Gezan SA
    J Hered; 2016 Jul; 107(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 27025440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative trait locus analysis of longitudinal quantitative trait data in complex pedigrees.
    Macgregor S; Knott SA; White I; Visscher PM
    Genetics; 2005 Nov; 171(3):1365-76. PubMed ID: 16020786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Coordinated conditional simulation with SLINK and SUP of many markers linked or associated to a trait in large pedigrees.
    Schäffer AA; Lemire M; Ott J; Lathrop GM; Weeks DE
    Hum Hered; 2011; 71(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 21734403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Thoroughbred racehorse mitochondrial DNA demonstrates closer than expected links between maternal genetic history and pedigree records.
    Bower MA; Whitten M; Nisbet RE; Spencer M; Dominy KM; Murphy AM; Cassidy R; Barrett E; Hill EW; Binns M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Jun; 130(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 23679948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Affected-only multiplex pedigree analysis of GAW10 problem 2.
    Nancarrow DJ; Mowry BJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 9433619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. swinger: a user-friendly computer program to establish captive breeding groups that minimize relatedness without pedigree information.
    Sandoval-Castillo J; Attard CR; Marri S; Brauer CJ; Möller LM; Beheregaray LB
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 27754599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating the power of a proposed linkage study for a complex genetic trait.
    Ploughman LM; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1989 Apr; 44(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 2929597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A framework for power and sensitivity analyses for quantitative genetic studies of natural populations, and case studies in Soay sheep (Ovis aries).
    Morrissey MB; Wilson AJ; Pemberton JM; Ferguson MM
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2309-21. PubMed ID: 17956393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. PRESTO: rapid calculation of order statistic distributions and multiple-testing adjusted P-values via permutation for one and two-stage genetic association studies.
    Browning BL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 9():309. PubMed ID: 18620604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation and visualization of identity-by-descent within pedigrees simplifies interpretation of complex trait analysis.
    Marchani EE; Wijsman EM
    Hum Hered; 2011; 72(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 22189471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.