These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27613451)

  • 1. A bootstrap approach to implementation science.
    Bender BG
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2016 Sep; 117(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 27613451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consideration of medical research vs. scientific research.
    Pyle DE
    Med Hypotheses; 2005; 65(6):1199. PubMed ID: 16144744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blending Quality Improvement and Research Methods for Implementation Science, Part II: Analysis of the Quality of Implementation.
    Pokorney SD; Taft C; Granger BB
    AACN Adv Crit Care; 2015; 26(4):366-71. PubMed ID: 26484998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Art, science and randomization.
    Abbasi K
    J R Soc Med; 2011 Sep; 104(9):347. PubMed ID: 21881081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More caveats for the scientific method: Randomized controls are unnecessary; Hormesis? But don't communicate your expectations; Robot computers!
    Romano PE
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2004; 19(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 14998362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility: It Is Just Good Science.
    Hewitt SM
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2016 Apr; 64(4):223. PubMed ID: 27029767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blending Quality Improvement and Research Methods for Implementation Science, Part III: Analysis of the Effectiveness of Implementation.
    Granger BB; Pokorney SD; Taft C
    AACN Adv Crit Care; 2016 Feb; 27(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 26909460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Consensus conferences].
    Formarier M
    Rech Soins Infirm; 2002 Jun; (69):3-4. PubMed ID: 12146503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meeting the Challenges of Intervention Research in Health Science: An Argument for a Multimethod Research Approach.
    Hansen HP; Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T
    Patient; 2016 Jun; 9(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 26597448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using database research to affect the science and art of medicine.
    Lanier WL
    Anesthesiology; 2010 Aug; 113(2):268-70. PubMed ID: 20571356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative, qualitative and emergent approaches to chiropractic research: a philosophical background.
    Mealing D
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 9567241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific methods are the only credible way forward for nursing research.
    Watson R
    J Adv Nurs; 2003 Aug; 43(3):219-20. PubMed ID: 12859779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Where's the evidence? Putting clinical science into pediatric rheumatology.
    Feldman BM; Giannini EH
    J Rheumatol; 1996 Sep; 23(9):1502-4. PubMed ID: 8877915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Innovative and Pragmatic Research Designs Are Critical to Advance Nursing Science.
    Yates P
    Cancer Nurs; 2016; 39(3):251-2. PubMed ID: 27081921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The methodological reflexions of Antonio Vallisneri].
    Baldini M
    Med Secoli; 1976; 13(3):547-58. PubMed ID: 799743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The science of improvement.
    Berwick DM
    JAMA; 2008 Mar; 299(10):1182-4. PubMed ID: 18334694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Something is better than nothing.
    Roberts S
    Nutrition; 2007; 23(11-12):911-2. PubMed ID: 17900865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mixed methods.
    Balding DJ; Barsh GS; Copenhaver GP; Yi C
    PLoS Genet; 2020 Jul; 16(7):e1008950. PubMed ID: 32667915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explaining feast or famine in randomized field trials. Medical science and criminology compared.
    Shepherd JP
    Eval Rev; 2003 Jun; 27(3):290-315. PubMed ID: 12789899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The science and ethics of the randomized clinical trial.
    Bleich HL
    MD Comput; 1995; 12(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 7854079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.