These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27613451)
1. A bootstrap approach to implementation science. Bender BG Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2016 Sep; 117(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 27613451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Consideration of medical research vs. scientific research. Pyle DE Med Hypotheses; 2005; 65(6):1199. PubMed ID: 16144744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Blending Quality Improvement and Research Methods for Implementation Science, Part II: Analysis of the Quality of Implementation. Pokorney SD; Taft C; Granger BB AACN Adv Crit Care; 2015; 26(4):366-71. PubMed ID: 26484998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Art, science and randomization. Abbasi K J R Soc Med; 2011 Sep; 104(9):347. PubMed ID: 21881081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. More caveats for the scientific method: Randomized controls are unnecessary; Hormesis? But don't communicate your expectations; Robot computers! Romano PE Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2004; 19(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 14998362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility: It Is Just Good Science. Hewitt SM J Histochem Cytochem; 2016 Apr; 64(4):223. PubMed ID: 27029767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Blending Quality Improvement and Research Methods for Implementation Science, Part III: Analysis of the Effectiveness of Implementation. Granger BB; Pokorney SD; Taft C AACN Adv Crit Care; 2016 Feb; 27(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 26909460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Meeting the Challenges of Intervention Research in Health Science: An Argument for a Multimethod Research Approach. Hansen HP; Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T Patient; 2016 Jun; 9(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 26597448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using database research to affect the science and art of medicine. Lanier WL Anesthesiology; 2010 Aug; 113(2):268-70. PubMed ID: 20571356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative, qualitative and emergent approaches to chiropractic research: a philosophical background. Mealing D J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 9567241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific methods are the only credible way forward for nursing research. Watson R J Adv Nurs; 2003 Aug; 43(3):219-20. PubMed ID: 12859779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Innovative and Pragmatic Research Designs Are Critical to Advance Nursing Science. Yates P Cancer Nurs; 2016; 39(3):251-2. PubMed ID: 27081921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The methodological reflexions of Antonio Vallisneri]. Baldini M Med Secoli; 1976; 13(3):547-58. PubMed ID: 799743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The science of improvement. Berwick DM JAMA; 2008 Mar; 299(10):1182-4. PubMed ID: 18334694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Something is better than nothing. Roberts S Nutrition; 2007; 23(11-12):911-2. PubMed ID: 17900865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]