174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27613735)
1. National Trends in Postoperative Outcomes and Cost Comparing Minimally Invasive Versus Open Liver and Pancreatic Surgery.
Okunrintemi V; Gani F; Pawlik TM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Nov; 20(11):1836-1843. PubMed ID: 27613735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections Among the Medicare Population.
Chen Q; Merath K; Bagante F; Akgul O; Dillhoff M; Cloyd J; Pawlik TM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Dec; 22(12):2088-2096. PubMed ID: 30039449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
Ejaz A; Sachs T; He J; Spolverato G; Hirose K; Ahuja N; Wolfgang CL; Makary MA; Weiss M; Pawlik TM
Surgery; 2014 Sep; 156(3):538-47. PubMed ID: 25017135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. National trends in resection of the distal pancreas.
Rosales-Velderrain A; Bowers SP; Goldberg RF; Clarke TM; Buchanan MA; Stauffer JA; Asbun HJ
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 18(32):4342-9. PubMed ID: 22969197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and the cost of conversion.
Stewart CL; Wong P; Selby L; Warner SG; Raoof M; Singh G; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
J Surg Oncol; 2020 Mar; 121(4):670-675. PubMed ID: 31967336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections.
Emmen AMLH; Görgec B; Zwart MJW; Daams F; Erdmann J; Festen S; Gouma DJ; van Gulik TM; van Hilst J; Kazemier G; Lof S; Sussenbach SI; Tanis PJ; Zonderhuis BM; Busch OR; Swijnenburg RJ; Besselink MG;
Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2659-2672. PubMed ID: 36401105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Bagante F; Spolverato G; Strasberg SM; Gani F; Thompson V; Hall BL; Bentrem DJ; Pitt HA; Pawlik TM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Sep; 20(9):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27412321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. National trends in the use of surgery for benign hepatic tumors in the United States.
Kim Y; Amini N; He J; Margonis GA; Weiss M; Wolfgang CL; Makary M; Hirose K; Spolverato G; Pawlik TM
Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1055-64. PubMed ID: 25769697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery at a Large Regional Health System: Assessing the Safety of Program Expansion.
Falls SJ; Maxwell CM; Kaye DJ; Dighe SG; Schiffman SC; Bartlett DL; Wagner PL; Allen CJ
Am Surg; 2024 Jan; 90(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 37578387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.
Wei D; Johnston S; Goldstein L; Nagle D
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):610-621. PubMed ID: 31089882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative Cost Analysis of Minimally Invasive vs Open Resection of Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.
Fontes RB; Wewel JT; OʼToole JE
Neurosurgery; 2016 Apr; 78(4):531-9. PubMed ID: 26509643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and outcome of combined liver and pancreatic resections.
Addeo P; Oussoultzoglou E; Fuchshuber P; Rosso E; Nobili C; Langella S; Jaeck D; Bachellier P
Br J Surg; 2014 May; 101(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 24668308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Procedural volume, cost, and reimbursement of outpatient incisional hernia repair: implications for payers and providers.
Song C; Liu E; Tackett S; Shi L; Marcus D
J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):623-632. PubMed ID: 28277031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Major Hepatic Resection.
DelPiccolo N; Onkendi E; Nguyen J; Patel S; Asbun HJ; Burns J; Croome K; Obi JR; Stauffer JA
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Jul; 30(7):790-796. PubMed ID: 32326822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Open versus minimally invasive ureteroneocystostomy: A population-level analysis.
Wang HH; Tejwani R; Cannon GM; Gargollo PC; Wiener JS; Routh JC
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):232.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27140001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new perspective on the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery-payer, provider, and patient benefits.
Keller DS; Senagore AJ; Fitch K; Bochner A; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2846-2853. PubMed ID: 27815745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of trends in operative approach and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery.
Addae JK; Gani F; Fang SY; Wick EC; Althumairi AA; Efron JE; Canner JK; Euhus DM; Schneider EB
J Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 208():111-120. PubMed ID: 27993198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
