These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2761376)

  • 1. [Effect of the radiation energy on patient radiation load and on the imaging width in lung study].
    Gurvich AM; Gurevich LA; Leonova NI; Maslov LA; Tombak MI
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1989 Jul; 34(7):67-72. PubMed ID: 2761376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Green-sensitive X-ray systems and specific features of working with them].
    Blinov NN; Gorelik FG; Reznik KA
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):13-5. PubMed ID: 12512275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of kilovoltage on the relative speed of rare-earth screens.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3460902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films].
    Hofmann T
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compatibility characteristics of five radiographic films utilised in Brazilian diagnostic radiology.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; de Almeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 23651656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [-Overexposed film--underexposed film-].
    Patrux C
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1997; 40(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 9754345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reciprocity law failure for a film-screen combination: very long exposure times.
    Hale J; Thomas JW
    Health Phys; 1983 Sep; 45(3):780-2. PubMed ID: 6885487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ektaspeed and a screen/film system compared with Ultra-Speed in the interpretation of early proximal caries.
    Kogon SL; Stephens RG; Reid JA; Donner A
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 50(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 6375836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.
    Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Lung imaging in intensive medicine. A comparison of digital storage-screen imaging and conventional film-screen imaging].
    Busch HP; Winter-Nossek A; Bethke U; Kohler P; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1990 Apr; 152(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 2160100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical aspects of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
    McLean D; Gray JE; Swensen SJ; Vrieze TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 9587768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New realities in the modern X-ray technology].
    Blinov NN; Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2003; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 14603840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
    Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Dosage loads and quality of the image in mammography].
    Kozlov AP; Shishov VA; Telesh LV; Fedorov IuA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1986; (3):74-9. PubMed ID: 3750831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Six screen-film combinations using the Oralix Pan DC.
    Kimura K; Underhill TE; Archila L; Linse JM; Langland OE
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1987 Jun; 29(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 3478427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of radiation exposures between conventional and rare-earth screen/film systems.
    Chu WK; Sangster W; Dobry CA
    Health Phys; 1985 Nov; 49(5):958-61. PubMed ID: 4066354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Dosage reduction using intensifying screens in panoramic tomography].
    Sewerin I; Solow B
    Tandlaegebladet; 1984 Oct; 88(17):608-10. PubMed ID: 6596769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.