These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27613778)
1. Allocation of Resources to Communication of Research Result Summaries. Richards JE; Bane E; Fullerton SM; Ludman EJ; Jarvik G J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Oct; 11(4):364-369. PubMed ID: 27613778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey. Porteri C; Pasqualetti P; Togni E; Parker M BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():81. PubMed ID: 25425352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Participant Satisfaction With a Preference-Setting Tool for the Return of Individual Research Results in Pediatric Genomic Research. Holm IA; Iles BR; Ziniel SI; Bacon PL; Savage SK; Christensen KD; Weitzman ER; Green RC; Huntington NL J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):414-26. PubMed ID: 26376753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences. Gordon DR; Radecki Breitkopf C; Robinson M; Petersen WO; Egginton JS; Chaffee KG; Petersen GM; Wolf SM; Koenig BA AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 30596322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Communicating with biobank participants: preferences for receiving and providing updates to researchers. Mester JL; Mercer M; Goldenberg A; Moore RA; Eng C; Sharp RR Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Apr; 24(4):708-12. PubMed ID: 25597748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attitudes Toward Return of Genetic Research Results to Relatives, Including After Death: Comparison of Cancer Probands, Blood Relatives, and Spouse/Partners. Radecki Breitkopf C; Wolf SM; Chaffee KG; Robinson ME; Lindor NM; Gordon DR; Koenig BA; Petersen GM J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Jul; 13(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 29701109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including after Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank. Breitkopf CR; Petersen GM; Wolf SM; Chaffee KG; Robinson ME; Gordon DR; Lindor NM; Koenig BA J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(3):464-75. PubMed ID: 26479556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facilitating return of actionable genetic research results from a biobank repository: Participant uptake and utilization of digital interventions. Phung L; Wood E; Egleston B; Hoffman-Andrews L; Ofidis D; Howe S; Mim R; Griffin H; Fetzer D; Owens A; Domchek S; Pyeritz R; Katona B; Kallish S; Sirugo G; Weaver J; Nathanson KL; Rader DJ; Bradbury AR HGG Adv; 2024 Oct; 5(4):100346. PubMed ID: 39183478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Perspectives from Managers of Two Distinct Research Biobanks. Petersen GM; Van Ness B J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 26479561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudes towards Personal Genomics and Sharing of Genetic Data among Older Swiss Adults: A Qualitative Study. Mählmann L; Schee Gen Halfmann S; von Wyl A; Brand A Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(5):293-306. PubMed ID: 29414817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Encouraging Participation And Transparency In Biobank Research. Spector-Bagdady K; De Vries RG; Gornick MG; Shuman AG; Kardia S; Platt J Health Aff (Millwood); 2018 Aug; 37(8):1313-1320. PubMed ID: 30080467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding public reactions to commercialization of biobanks and use of biobank resources. Nicol D; Critchley C; McWhirter R; Whitton T Soc Sci Med; 2016 Aug; 162():79-87. PubMed ID: 27343817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent, biobank research, and locality: perceptions of breast cancer patients in three European countries. Petersen I; Desmedt C; Harris A; Buffa F; Kollek R J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):48-55. PubMed ID: 25746784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Becoming and being a biobank donor: The role of relationships and ethics. Mezinska S; Kaleja J; Mileiko I PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242828. PubMed ID: 33227030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project. Allen NL; Karlson EW; Malspeis S; Lu B; Seidman CE; Lehmann LS Mayo Clin Proc; 2014 Jun; 89(6):738-46. PubMed ID: 24943692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Participants' Accounts on Their Decision to Join a Cohort Study With an Attached Biobank: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study Within Two German Studies. Nobile H; Bergmann MM; Moldenhauer J; Borry P J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):237-49. PubMed ID: 27381010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adult patient perspectives on clinical trial result reporting: A survey of cancer patients. Elzinga KE; Khan OF; Tang AR; Fernandez CV; Elzinga CL; Heng DY; Vickers MM; Truong TH; Tang PA Clin Trials; 2016 Dec; 13(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 27559022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]