These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2761405)

  • 1. On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters.
    Johnson NF; Allen PA; Strand TL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):474-82. PubMed ID: 2761405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latency dependence of word-initial letter integration by the saccadic system.
    Doré K; Beauvillain C
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 9158327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 1435271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multistream model of visual word recognition.
    Allen PA; Smith AF; Lien MC; Kaut KP; Canfield A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 19304618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting letters in continuous text: effects of display size.
    Healy AF; Oliver WL; McNamara TP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 2953857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word-superiority paradigm.
    Hayman CA; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 2927310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.
    Marmurek HH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: evidence from eye movements when reading Thai.
    Winskel H; Perea M; Ratitamkul T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1522-36. PubMed ID: 22502779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adult age differences in letter-level and word-level processing.
    Allen PA; Madden DJ; Crozier LC
    Psychol Aging; 1991 Jun; 6(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 1863395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition.
    Grainger J; O'Regan JK; Jacobs AM; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 1549424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On time differences in searching for letters in words and nonwords: do they emerge during the initial encoding or the subsequent scan?
    Johnson NF; Carnot MJ
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2314225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Letter information and orthographic context in word perception.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):595-609. PubMed ID: 528961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contextual facilitation in a letter search task depends on how the prime is processed.
    Smith MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 528936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1987; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M; Demetriou C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Dec; 66(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 22686154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adult age differences in the effects of sentence context and stimulus degradation during visual word recognition.
    Madden DJ
    Psychol Aging; 1988 Jun; 3(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 3268255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition?
    Davis CJ; Bowers JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):923-41. PubMed ID: 15462631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of words and letters within words.
    Johnson NF; Marmurek HH
    Am J Psychol; 1978 Sep; 91(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 742661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.