These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2761405)

  • 21. Word context effects on letter recognition.
    Jacewicz MM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 1):935-42. PubMed ID: 482048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is nevtral NEUTRAL? Visual similarity effects in the early phases of written-word recognition.
    Marcet A; Perea M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1180-1185. PubMed ID: 27873186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Geometric and semantic similarity in visual masking.
    Jacobson JZ; Rhinelander G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 May; 4(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 660097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming.
    Welvaert M; Farioli F; Grainger J
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 18271354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Target letter inclusion in single and multiple word substrings and identification accuracy.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1988 Apr; 115(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3385413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Not all visual features are created equal: early processing in letter and word recognition.
    Lanthier SN; Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19145012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence for a parallel input serial analysis model of word processing.
    Allen PA; Madden DJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 2137523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Context-dependent migrations in visual word perception.
    van der Velde F; van der Heijden AH; Schreuder R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 2522523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional demands of visual word recognition.
    Herdman CM; Dobbs AR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 2522522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The importance of the first and last letter in words during sentence reading.
    Johnson RL; Eisler ME
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Nov; 141(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 23089042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Letter migration in word perception.
    Mozer MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Aug; 9(4):531-46. PubMed ID: 6224891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. From word superiority to word inferiority: visual processing of letters and words in pure alexia.
    Habekost T; Petersen A; Behrmann M; Starrfelt R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2014; 31(5-6):413-36. PubMed ID: 24801564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual detection of multi-letter patterns.
    Staller JD; Lappin JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Dec; 7(6):1258-72. PubMed ID: 6458650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The independence of letter identity and letter doubling in reading.
    Fischer-Baum S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):873-878. PubMed ID: 27542802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Concurrent effects of lexical status and letter-rotation during early stage visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs.
    Kim AE; Straková J
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1468():52-62. PubMed ID: 22784511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of letter features in visual-word recognition: Evidence from a delayed segment technique.
    Rosa E; Perea M; Enneson P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():133-42. PubMed ID: 27289422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Episodic effects on the visual comparison of letters in words.
    Marmurek HH
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Nov; 52(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 1437488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction.
    Krueger LE; Shapiro RG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):657-673. PubMed ID: 528966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.