These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

628 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27614541)

  • 1. Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Pulse-Wave Velocity: Validation against Invasive Pressure Measurements.
    Styczynski G; Rdzanek A; Pietrasik A; Kochman J; Huczek Z; Sobieraj P; Gaciong Z; Szmigielski C
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2016 Nov; 29(11):1109-1116. PubMed ID: 27614541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Echo-Doppler assessment of arterial stiffness in pediatric patients with Kawasaki disease.
    AlHuzaimi A; Al Mashham Y; Potts JE; De Souza AM; Sandor GG
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Sep; 26(9):1084-9. PubMed ID: 23800509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Required temporal resolution for accurate thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity measurements by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with clinical standard applanation tonometry.
    Dorniak K; Heiberg E; Hellmann M; Rawicz-Zegrzda D; Wesierska M; Galaska R; Sabisz A; Szurowska E; Dudziak M; Hedström E
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 May; 16(1):110. PubMed ID: 27387199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Assessed by Ultrasound: A Study with Echotracking Technology.
    Collette M; Palombo C; Morizzo C; Sbragi S; Kozakova M; Leftheriotis G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 28395967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of pulse wave velocity assessed by three different techniques: Arteriograph, Complior, and Echo-tracking.
    Mihalcea DJ; Florescu M; Suran BM; Enescu OA; Mincu RI; Magda S; Patrascu N; Vinereanu D
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Apr; 31(4):568-77. PubMed ID: 25633054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mean arterial pressure values calculated using seven different methods and their associations with target organ deterioration in a single-center study of 1878 individuals.
    Papaioannou TG; Protogerou AD; Vrachatis D; Konstantonis G; Aissopou E; Argyris A; Nasothimiou E; Gialafos EJ; Karamanou M; Tousoulis D; Sfikakis PP
    Hypertens Res; 2016 Sep; 39(9):640-7. PubMed ID: 27194570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aortic length measurements for pulse wave velocity calculation: manual 2D vs automated 3D centreline extraction.
    van Engelen A; Silva Vieira M; Rafiq I; Cecelja M; Schneider T; de Bliek H; Figueroa CA; Hussain T; Botnar RM; Alastruey J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):32. PubMed ID: 28270208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different methods for the estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Houriez-Gombaud-Saintonge S; Mousseaux E; Bargiotas I; De Cesare A; Dietenbeck T; Bouaou K; Redheuil A; Soulat G; Giron A; Gencer U; Craiem D; Messas E; Bollache E; Chenoune Y; Kachenoura N
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Dec; 21(1):75. PubMed ID: 31829235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive Estimation of Aortic Stiffness Through Different Approaches.
    Salvi P; Scalise F; Rovina M; Moretti F; Salvi L; Grillo A; Gao L; Baldi C; Faini A; Furlanis G; Sorropago A; Millasseau SC; Sorropago G; Carretta R; Avolio AP; Parati G
    Hypertension; 2019 Jul; 74(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 31132954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noninvasive measurement of regional pulse wave velocity in human ascending aorta with ultrasound imaging: an in-vivo feasibility study.
    Huang C; Guo D; Lan F; Zhang H; Luo J
    J Hypertens; 2016 Oct; 34(10):2026-37. PubMed ID: 27467765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Group delay method for MRI aortic pulse wave velocity measurements in clinical protocols with low temporal resolution: Validation in a heterogeneous cohort.
    Pahlevan NM; Yao T; Chu K; Cole S; Tran T; Wood JC; King KS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jun; 69():8-15. PubMed ID: 32105671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo assessment of arterial stiffness in the isoflurane anesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rat.
    Morgan EE; Casabianca AB; Khouri SJ; Kalinoski AL
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2014 Sep; 12():37. PubMed ID: 25227282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Different Pulse Waveforms for Local Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement in Healthy and Hypertensive Common Carotid Arteries in Vivo.
    Huang C; Su Y; Zhang H; Qian LX; Luo J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1111-23. PubMed ID: 26924694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bramwell-Hill modeling for local aortic pulse wave velocity estimation: a validation study with velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive pressure assessment.
    Westenberg JJ; van Poelgeest EP; Steendijk P; Grotenhuis HB; Jukema JW; de Roos A
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 22230116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation and reproducibility of aortic pulse wave velocity as assessed with velocity-encoded MRI.
    Grotenhuis HB; Westenberg JJ; Steendijk P; van der Geest RJ; Ottenkamp J; Bax JJ; Jukema JW; de Roos A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):521-6. PubMed ID: 19711407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved pressure contour analysis for estimating cardiac stroke volume using pulse wave velocity measurement.
    Kamoi S; Pretty C; Balmer J; Davidson S; Pironet A; Desaive T; Shaw GM; Chase JG
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Apr; 16(1):51. PubMed ID: 28438216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of differences between repeated pulse wave velocity measurements in terms of 'bias' in the extrapolated cardiovascular risk and the classification of aortic stiffness: is a single PWV measurement enough?
    Papaioannou TG; Protogerou AD; Nasothimiou EG; Tzamouranis D; Skliros N; Achimastos A; Papadogiannis D; Stefanadis CI
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Oct; 26(10):594-602. PubMed ID: 21833024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In Vitro Validation of 4D Flow MRI for Local Pulse Wave Velocity Estimation.
    Ruesink T; Medero R; Rutkowski D; Roldán-Alzate A
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):674-687. PubMed ID: 30218205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of sampling density on the accuracy of aortic pulse wave velocity from velocity-encoded MRI in patients with Marfan syndrome.
    Kröner ES; van der Geest RJ; Scholte AJ; Kroft LJ; van den Boogaard PJ; Hendriksen D; Lamb HJ; Siebelink HM; Mulder BJ; Groenink M; Radonic T; Hilhorst-Hofstee Y; Bax JJ; van der Wall EE; de Roos A; Reiber JH; Westenberg JJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22730278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive arterial blood pressure waveform monitoring using two- element ultrasound system.
    Seo J; Pietrangelo SJ; Lee HS; Sodini CG
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Apr; 62(4):776-84. PubMed ID: 25881355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.