These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27616462)

  • 41. Attitude and norm accessibility affect processing of anti-smoking messages.
    Rhodes N; Roskos-Ewoldsen DR; Edison A; Bradford MB
    Health Psychol; 2008 May; 27(3S):S224-32. PubMed ID: 18979975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Smoking in Morocco: an outline of the anti-smoking campaign].
    Bartal M; Bouayad Z; Bahlaoui A; Naciri A; el Meziane A
    Hygie; 1988 Mar; 7(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 3371994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The influence of message framing, intention to quit smoking, and nicotine dependence on the persuasiveness of smoking cessation messages.
    Moorman M; van den Putte B
    Addict Behav; 2008 Oct; 33(10):1267-75. PubMed ID: 18584971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of framing and fear on ratings and impact of antimarijuana PSAs.
    Zimmerman RS; Cupp PK; Abadi M; Donohew RL; Gray C; Gordon L; Grossl AB
    Subst Use Misuse; 2014 Jun; 49(7):824-35. PubMed ID: 24502372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of Character-Audience Similarity on the Perceived Effectiveness of Antismoking PSAs via Engagement.
    Kim M; Shi R; Cappella JN
    Health Commun; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1193-204. PubMed ID: 26891148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of message frame in anti-smoking public service announcements on cognitive response and attitude toward smoking.
    Shen L
    Health Commun; 2010 Jan; 25(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 20390667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effectiveness of antismoking public service announcements on children's intent to smoke.
    Nixon CL; Mansfield PM; Thoms P
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2008 Dec; 22(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 19071974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of message framing and visual-fear appeals on smoker responses to antismoking ads.
    Kang J; Lin CA
    J Health Commun; 2015; 20(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 25868549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Promotion of smoking cessation with emotional and/or graphic antismoking advertising.
    Farrelly MC; Duke JC; Davis KC; Nonnemaker JM; Kamyab K; Willett JG; Juster HR
    Am J Prev Med; 2012 Nov; 43(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 23079169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How neuroticism affects responses to anti-smoking messages.
    Bates CE; Monahan JL; Rhodes N
    Health Commun; 2012; 27(5):486-97. PubMed ID: 22007935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Affective and executive network processing associated with persuasive antidrug messages.
    Ramsay IS; Yzer MC; Luciana M; Vohs KD; MacDonald AW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 25(7):1136-47. PubMed ID: 23530896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of smoking cues in movies on craving among smokers.
    Lochbuehler K; Engels RC; Scholte RH
    Addiction; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2102-9. PubMed ID: 19804459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Qualitative study of Singaporean youths' perception of antismoking campaigns: what works and what does not.
    Shahwan S; Fauziana R; Satghare P; Vaingankar J; Picco L; Chong SA; Subramaniam M
    Tob Control; 2016 Dec; 25(e2):e101-e106. PubMed ID: 26944686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Individual differences in drivers' cognitive processing of road safety messages.
    Kaye SA; White MJ; Lewis IM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():272-81. PubMed ID: 22608267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Testing antismoking messages for Air Force trainees.
    Popova L; Linde BD; Bursac Z; Talcott GW; Modayil MV; Little MA; Ling PM; Glantz SA; Klesges RC
    Tob Control; 2016 Nov; 25(6):656-663. PubMed ID: 26482786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Enhancing the effectiveness of antismoking messages via self-congruent appeals.
    Chang C
    Health Commun; 2009 Jan; 24(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19204856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Attitudinal and Motivational Effects of Anti-waterpipe Messages.
    Stevens EM; Kim S; Leshner G; Leavens ELS; Vidrine JI; Frank-Pearce SG; Hale JJ; Wagener TL
    Am J Health Behav; 2019 May; 43(3):478-489. PubMed ID: 31046879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of combining fear and anger in anti-smoking messages to discourage young smokers.
    Colin C; Droulers O
    Public Health; 2022 Oct; 211():47-52. PubMed ID: 36027787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The potential of shame as a message appeal in antismoking television advertisements.
    Amonini C; Pettigrew S; Clayforth C
    Tob Control; 2015 Sep; 24(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 25666549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A pilot study on the neurometric evaluation of "effective" and "ineffective" antismoking public service announcements.
    Cartocci G; Modica E; Rossi D; Maglione AG; Venuti I; Rossi G; Corsi E; Babiloni F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():4597-4600. PubMed ID: 28269299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.