177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27616640)
1. Electromyography evaluation of masseter and temporalis, bite force, and quality of life in elderly patients during the adaptation of mandibular implant-supported overdentures.
Sônego MV; Goiato MC; Dos Santos DM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Oct; 28(10):e169-e174. PubMed ID: 27616640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical feasibility of mandibular implant overdenture retainers submitted to immediate load.
da Silva RJ; Issa JP; Semprini M; da Silva CH; de Vasconcelos PB; Celino CA; Siéssere S; Regalo SC
Gerodontology; 2011 Sep; 28(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20609008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG.
Uçankale M; Akoğlu B; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK
Gerodontology; 2012 Mar; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20604812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of varying implant position in immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular overdentures.
Shaarawy MA; Aboelross EM
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 23339758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient's satisfaction with implant overdentures: a systematic review of the literature.
Boven GC; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 42(3):220-33. PubMed ID: 25307515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of various attachment types in mandibular implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG.
van Kampen FM; van der Bilt A; Cune MS; Bosman F
J Dent Res; 2002 Mar; 81(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 11881630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional versus implant-retained overlay dentures: a pilot study of masseter and anterior temporalis electromyography.
Dakhilalian M; Rismanchian M; Fazel A; Basiri K; Azadeh H; Mahmoodi M; Fayazi S; Sadr-Eshkvari P
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Aug; 40(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 25106005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chewing efficiency and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle with three designs of implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A cross-over study.
Elsyad MA; Hegazy SA; Hammouda NI; Al-Tonbary GY; Habib AA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):742-8. PubMed ID: 23445173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of denture stability on bite force and muscular effort.
Caloss R; Al-Arab M; Finn RA; Throckmorton GS
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Jun; 38(6):434-9. PubMed ID: 21050259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types.
van der Bilt A; van Kampen FM; Cune MS
Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients.
Rismanchian M; Bajoghli F; Mostajeran Z; Fazel A; Eshkevari Ps
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 19813425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant-supported prostheses: a cross-sectional multicenter study.
Müller F; Hernandez M; Grütter L; Aracil-Kessler L; Weingart D; Schimmel M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):144-150. PubMed ID: 21631592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement and long-term stability of neuromuscular adaptation in implant-supported overdentures.
Heckmann SM; Heussinger S; Linke JJ; Graef F; Pröschel P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1200-5. PubMed ID: 19832766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biting Force and Muscle Activity in Implant-Supported Single Mandibular Overdentures Opposing Fixed Maxillary Dentition.
Al-Magaleh WR; Abbas NA; Amer AA; Abdelkader AA; Bahgat B
Implant Dent; 2016 Apr; 25(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 26684910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bite forces with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Fontijn-Tekamp FA; Slagter AP; van't Hof MA; Geertman ME; Kalk W
J Dent Res; 1998 Oct; 77(10):1832-9. PubMed ID: 9786640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures.
Amaral CF; Pinheiro MA; de Moraes M; Rodrigues Garcia RCM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1383-1389. PubMed ID: 30427971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of mini-implant-supported mandibular overdentures on electromyographic activity of the masseter muscle during chewing of hard and soft food.
Ashmawy TM; El Talawy DB; Shaheen NH
Quintessence Int; 2014 Sep; 45(8):663-71. PubMed ID: 25019110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masticatory function with ball and resilient telescopic anchors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: A crossover study.
Elsyad MA; Shawky AF
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(8):615-623. PubMed ID: 28681044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
