403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27617373)
1. Clinical Performance of Indirect Composite Onlays as Esthetic Alternative to Stainless Steel Crowns for Rehabilitation of a Large Carious Primary Molar.
Mittal HC; Goyal A; Gauba K; Kapur A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(5):345-52. PubMed ID: 27617373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical success of stainless steel crowns placed under general anaesthesia in primary molars: an observational follow up study.
Schüler IM; Hiller M; Roloff T; Kühnisch J; Heinrich-Weltzien R
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1396-403. PubMed ID: 24994618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Parental Satisfaction with Three Tooth-Colored Full-Coronal Restorations in Primary Maxillary Incisors.
Salami A; Walia T; Bashiri R
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26551364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
Atieh M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Observational: prospective study of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars using resin-modified glass ionomer and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate: a 12-month Follow-up.
Rosenberg L; Atar M; Daronch M; Honig A; Chey M; Funny MD; Cruz L
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 23635886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Success rates of a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and minocycline antibiotics used in the non-instrumentation endodontic treatment of mandibular primary molars with carious pulpal involvement.
Trairatvorakul C; Detsomboonrat P
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2012 May; 22(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 21951271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.
Veerabadhran MM; Reddy V; Nayak UA; Rao AP; Sundaram MA
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22565513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of 3 types of primary esthetic stainless steel crowns.
Beattie S; Taskonak B; Jones J; Chin J; Sanders B; Tomlin A; Weddell J
J Can Dent Assoc; 2011; 77():b90. PubMed ID: 21736864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chairside repair of preveneered primary molar stainless steel crowns: a pilot study.
Kratunova E; O'Connell AC
Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 25685973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term clinical performance of esthetic primary molar crowns.
Ram D; Fuks AB; Eidelman E
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):582-4. PubMed ID: 14733474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical and radiographic comparative evaluation of custom-made zirconia crowns using CAD-CAM and stainless steel crowns in primary molars.
Prabhu D; Anantharaj A; Praveen P; Rani SP; Sudhir R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 35439881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Zirconia crowns--an esthetic and resistant restorative alternative for ECC affected primary teeth.
Planells del Pozo P; Fuks AB
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 25095311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns.
Sonmez D; Duruturk L
Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):E18; discussion 408-9. PubMed ID: 20448584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of ultraviolet irradiation on the bond strength of a composite resin adhered to stainless steel crowns.
Baeza-Robleto SJ; Villa-Negrete DM; García-Contreras R; Scougall-Vílchis RJ; Guadarrama-Quiroz LJ; Robles-Bermeo NL
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 23635891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Primary Molar Crowns: 24-Month Results.
Donly KJ; Sasa I; Contreras CI; Mendez MJC
Pediatr Dent; 2018 Jul; 40(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 30345963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-year clinical follow-up of posterior teeth restored with leucite-reinforced ips empress onlays and partial veneer crowns.
Murgueitio R; Bernal G
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 22372380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three-dimensional printed resin crowns and preformed stainless steel crowns for primary molar restorations: a randomized controlled trial.
Lee KE; Kang HS; Shin SY; Lee T; Lee HS; Song JS
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 May; 48(3):59-67. PubMed ID: 38755983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
