BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27617641)

  • 21. Simulation-based ureteroscopy training: a systematic review.
    Brunckhorst O; Aydin A; Abboudi H; Sahai A; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 25130385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surgical simulation: a urological perspective.
    Wignall GR; Denstedt JD; Preminger GM; Cadeddu JA; Pearle MS; Sweet RM; McDougall EM
    J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1690-9. PubMed ID: 18343441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effectiveness of procedural simulation in urology: a systematic review.
    Ahmed K; Jawad M; Abboudi M; Gavazzi A; Darzi A; Athanasiou T; Vale J; Khan MS; Dasgupta P
    J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 21571338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.
    Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ
    BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
    Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Design and validation of a low-cost, high-fidelity model for robotic pyeloplasty simulation training.
    Timberlake MD; Garbens A; Schlomer BJ; Kavoussi NL; Kern AJM; Peters CA; Gahan JC
    J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Jun; 16(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 32173325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Virtual reality vs. physical models in surgical skills training. An update of the evidence.
    Chahal B; Aydin A; Ahmed K
    Curr Opin Urol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 37962178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Current Educational Interventions for Improving Technical Skills of Urology Trainees in Endourological Procedures: A Systematic Review.
    Aditya I; Kwong JCC; Canil T; Lee JY; Goldenberg MG
    J Endourol; 2020 Jul; 34(7):723-731. PubMed ID: 31691593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of the RobotiX Mentor Robotic Surgery Simulator.
    Whittaker G; Aydin A; Raison N; Kum F; Challacombe B; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
    J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 26576836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predictive and construct validity of virtual reality cataract surgery simulators.
    Nayer ZH; Murdock B; Dharia IP; Belyea DA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jun; 46(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 32541408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Simulation-based training in urology: A systematic literature review].
    Fiard G; Descotes JL; Troccaz J
    Prog Urol; 2019; 29(6):295-311. PubMed ID: 31047788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of a Full-Immersion Simulation Platform for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Three-Dimensional Printing Technology.
    Ghazi A; Campbell T; Melnyk R; Feng C; Andrusco A; Stone J; Erturk E
    J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1314-1320. PubMed ID: 29048214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mechanical simulators for training for laparoscopic surgery in urology.
    Rassweiler J; Klein J; Teber D; Schulze M; Frede T
    J Endourol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):252-62. PubMed ID: 17444768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators - a systematic review.
    Abboudi H; Khan MS; Aboumarzouk O; Guru KA; Challacombe B; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
    BJU Int; 2013 Feb; 111(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 22672340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Novel biologic model for percutaneous renal surgery learning and training in the laboratory.
    Zhang Y; Ou TW; Jia JG; Gao W; Cui X; Wu JT; Wang G
    Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):513-6. PubMed ID: 18639322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of a High-End Virtual Reality Simulator for Training Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.
    Schulz GB; Grimm T; Buchner A; Jokisch F; Casuscelli J; Kretschmer A; Mumm JN; Ziegelmüller B; Stief CG; Karl A
    J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(2):568-577. PubMed ID: 30181038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simulation in Urological Training and Education (SIMULATE): Protocol and curriculum development of the first multicentre international randomized controlled trial assessing the transferability of simulation-based surgical training.
    Aydin A; Ahmed K; Van Hemelrijck M; Ahmed HU; Khan MS; Dasgupta P;
    BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):202-211. PubMed ID: 32189446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing visual control during simulated and live operations: gathering evidence for the content validity of simulation using eye movement metrics.
    Vine SJ; McGrath JS; Bright E; Dutton T; Clark J; Wilson MR
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jun; 28(6):1788-93. PubMed ID: 24414457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Virtual reality simulator training of laparoscopic cholecystectomies - a systematic review.
    Ikonen TS; Antikainen T; Silvennoinen M; Isojärvi J; Mäkinen E; Scheinin TM
    Scand J Surg; 2012; 101(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 22414461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery.
    Moglia A; Ferrari V; Morelli L; Ferrari M; Mosca F; Cuschieri A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1065-80. PubMed ID: 26433570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.