BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27617969)

  • 1. Functions, Regulation, and Therapeutic Implications of the ATR Checkpoint Pathway.
    Yazinski SA; Zou L
    Annu Rev Genet; 2016 Nov; 50():155-173. PubMed ID: 27617969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer.
    Smith J; Tho LM; Xu N; Gillespie DA
    Adv Cancer Res; 2010; 108():73-112. PubMed ID: 21034966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA-PK phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 regulates replication stress checkpoint activation, fork restart, homologous recombination and mitotic catastrophe.
    Ashley AK; Shrivastav M; Nie J; Amerin C; Troksa K; Glanzer JG; Liu S; Opiyo SO; Dimitrova DD; Le P; Sishc B; Bailey SM; Oakley GG; Nickoloff JA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2014 Sep; 21():131-9. PubMed ID: 24819595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The complexity of DNA double strand break is a crucial factor for activating ATR signaling pathway for G2/M checkpoint regulation regardless of ATM function.
    Xue L; Furusawa Y; Okayasu R; Miura M; Cui X; Liu C; Hirayama R; Matsumoto Y; Yajima H; Yu D
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 Jan; 25():72-83. PubMed ID: 25497328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The BRUCE-ATR Signaling Axis Is Required for Accurate DNA Replication and Suppression of Liver Cancer Development.
    Ge C; Vilfranc CL; Che L; Pandita RK; Hambarde S; Andreassen PR; Niu L; Olowokure O; Shah S; Waltz SE; Zou L; Wang J; Pandita TK; Du C
    Hepatology; 2019 Jun; 69(6):2608-2622. PubMed ID: 30693543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ATR Signaling Uncouples the Role of RAD51 Paralogs in Homologous Recombination and Replication Stress Response.
    Saxena S; Dixit S; Somyajit K; Nagaraju G
    Cell Rep; 2019 Oct; 29(3):551-559.e4. PubMed ID: 31618626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ATR-Chk1 activation mitigates replication stress caused by mismatch repair-dependent processing of DNA damage.
    Gupta D; Lin B; Cowan A; Heinen CD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Feb; 115(7):1523-1528. PubMed ID: 29378956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ATR inhibition rewires cellular signaling networks induced by replication stress.
    Wagner SA; Oehler H; Voigt A; Dalic D; Freiwald A; Serve H; Beli P
    Proteomics; 2016 Feb; 16(3):402-16. PubMed ID: 26572502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork.
    Paulsen RD; Cimprich KA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):953-66. PubMed ID: 17531546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ATR inhibition preferentially targets homologous recombination-deficient tumor cells.
    Krajewska M; Fehrmann RS; Schoonen PM; Labib S; de Vries EG; Franke L; van Vugt MA
    Oncogene; 2015 Jun; 34(26):3474-81. PubMed ID: 25174396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Adaptive Mechanisms and Checkpoint Responses to a Stressed DNA Replication Fork.
    Saldanha J; Rageul J; Patel JA; Kim H
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jun; 24(13):. PubMed ID: 37445667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Roles of ATM and ATR in DNA double strand breaks and replication stress.
    Williams RM; Zhang X
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2021 Aug; 163():109-119. PubMed ID: 33887296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cancer-Specific Synthetic Lethality between ATR and CHK1 Kinase Activities.
    Sanjiv K; Hagenkort A; Calderón-Montaño JM; Koolmeister T; Reaper PM; Mortusewicz O; Jacques SA; Kuiper RV; Schultz N; Scobie M; Charlton PA; Pollard JR; Berglund UW; Altun M; Helleday T
    Cell Rep; 2016 Jan; 14(2):298-309. PubMed ID: 26748709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Roles of ATM and ATR in DNA double strand breaks and replication stress.
    Williams RM; Zhang X
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2021 May; 161():27-38. PubMed ID: 33259832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Curcumin suppresses multiple DNA damage response pathways and has potency as a sensitizer to PARP inhibitor.
    Ogiwara H; Ui A; Shiotani B; Zou L; Yasui A; Kohno T
    Carcinogenesis; 2013 Nov; 34(11):2486-97. PubMed ID: 23825154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploiting replicative stress in gynecological cancers as a therapeutic strategy.
    Ngoi NY; Sundararajan V; Tan DS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1224-1238. PubMed ID: 32571890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. WWOX modulates the ATR-mediated DNA damage checkpoint response.
    Abu-Odeh M; Hereema NA; Aqeilan RI
    Oncotarget; 2016 Jan; 7(4):4344-55. PubMed ID: 26675548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevention of DNA Replication Stress by CHK1 Leads to Chemoresistance Despite a DNA Repair Defect in Homologous Recombination in Breast Cancer.
    Meyer F; Becker S; Classen S; Parplys AC; Mansour WY; Riepen B; Timm S; Ruebe C; Jasin M; Wikman H; Petersen C; Rothkamm K; Borgmann K
    Cells; 2020 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 31963582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dormant origin signaling during unperturbed replication.
    Moiseeva TN; Bakkenist CJ
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2019 Sep; 81():102655. PubMed ID: 31311769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA damage response curtails detrimental replication stress and chromosomal instability induced by the dietary carcinogen PhIP.
    Mimmler M; Peter S; Kraus A; Stroh S; Nikolova T; Seiwert N; Hasselwander S; Neitzel C; Haub J; Monien BH; Nicken P; Steinberg P; Shay JW; Kaina B; Fahrer J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Dec; 44(21):10259-10276. PubMed ID: 27599846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.