These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27618247)

  • 1. Model Building of Antibody-Antigen Complex Structures Using GBSA Scores.
    Shimba N; Kamiya N; Nakamura H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Oct; 56(10):2005-2012. PubMed ID: 27618247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.
    Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Regression analysis to select native-like structures from decoys of antigen-antibody docking].
    Chen Z; Chi X; Fan P; Zhang G; Wang M; Yu C; Chen W
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2018 Jun; 34(6):993-1001. PubMed ID: 29943545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structure-based cross-docking analysis of antibody-antigen interactions.
    Kilambi KP; Gray JJ
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):8145. PubMed ID: 28811664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 9. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for protein-peptide complexes.
    Weng G; Wang E; Chen F; Sun H; Wang Z; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 May; 21(19):10135-10145. PubMed ID: 31062799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.
    Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 4. Accuracies of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methodologies evaluated by various simulation protocols using PDBbind data set.
    Sun H; Li Y; Tian S; Xu L; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Aug; 16(31):16719-29. PubMed ID: 24999761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consensus scoring for enriching near-native structures from protein-protein docking decoys.
    Liang S; Meroueh SO; Wang G; Qiu C; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 18831053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A decoy set for the thermostable subdomain from chicken villin headpiece, comparison of different free energy estimators.
    Fogolari F; Tosatto SC; Colombo G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6():301. PubMed ID: 16354298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 8. Predicting binding free energies and poses of protein-RNA complexes.
    Chen F; Sun H; Wang J; Zhu F; Liu H; Wang Z; Lei T; Li Y; Hou T
    RNA; 2018 Sep; 24(9):1183-1194. PubMed ID: 29930024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A computational approach for studying antibody-antigen interactions without prior structural information: the anti-testosterone binding antibody as a case study.
    Koivuniemi A; Takkinen K; Nevanen T
    Proteins; 2017 Feb; 85(2):322-331. PubMed ID: 27936519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting fragment binding poses using a combined MCSS MM-GBSA approach.
    Haider MK; Bertrand HO; Hubbard RE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 May; 51(5):1092-105. PubMed ID: 21528911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A soft docking algorithm for predicting the structure of antibody-antigen complexes.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Proteins; 2003 Jul; 52(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 12784367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Refining evERdock: Improved selection of good protein-protein complex models achieved by MD optimization and use of multiple conformations.
    Shinobu A; Takemura K; Matubayasi N; Kitao A
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Nov; 149(19):195101. PubMed ID: 30466278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RosettaCM for antibodies with very long HCDR3s and low template availability.
    Kodali P; Schoeder CT; Schmitz S; Crowe JE; Meiler J
    Proteins; 2021 Nov; 89(11):1458-1472. PubMed ID: 34176159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parallel cascade selection molecular dynamics to screen for protein complexes generated by rigid docking.
    Harada R; Yoshino R; Nishizawa H; Shigeta Y
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Nov; 92():94-99. PubMed ID: 31344548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protein-protein structure prediction by scoring molecular dynamics trajectories of putative poses.
    Sarti E; Gladich I; Zamuner S; Correia BE; Laio A
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84(9):1312-20. PubMed ID: 27253756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward rational antibody design: recent advancements in molecular dynamics simulations.
    Yamashita T
    Int Immunol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):133-140. PubMed ID: 29346652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.
    Graves AP; Shivakumar DM; Boyce SE; Jacobson MP; Case DA; Shoichet BK
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Mar; 377(3):914-34. PubMed ID: 18280498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.