These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27618500)

  • 1. The mixed randomized trial: combining randomized, pragmatic and observational clinical trial designs.
    Alsop J; Scott M; Archey W
    J Comp Eff Res; 2016 Nov; 5(6):569-579. PubMed ID: 27618500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trial designs using real-world data: The changing landscape of the regulatory approval process.
    Baumfeld Andre E; Reynolds R; Caubel P; Azoulay L; Dreyer NA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1201-1212. PubMed ID: 31823482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 1. Introduction.
    Zuidgeest MGP; Goetz I; Groenwold RHH; Irving E; van Thiel GJMW; Grobbee DE;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():7-13. PubMed ID: 28549929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond HERS: some (not so) random thoughts on randomized clinical trials.
    Bush T
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2001; 46(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 11374656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Realization of design regarding experimental research in the clinical real-world research].
    He Q; Shi JP
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 39(4):519-523. PubMed ID: 29699050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 5. Usual care and real life comparators.
    Zuidgeest MGP; Welsing PMJ; van Thiel GJMW; Ciaglia A; Alfonso-Cristancho R; Eckert L; Eijkemans MJC; Egger M;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():92-98. PubMed ID: 28694123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How study designs influence comparative effectiveness outcomes: the case of oral versus long-acting injectable antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia.
    Alphs L; Schooler N; Lauriello J
    Schizophr Res; 2014 Jul; 156(2-3):228-32. PubMed ID: 24842538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A practical Bayesian stepped wedge design for community-based cluster-randomized clinical trials: The British Columbia Telehealth Trial.
    Cunanan KM; Carlin BP; Peterson KA
    Clin Trials; 2016 Dec; 13(6):641-650. PubMed ID: 27430710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
    Dal-Ré R; Janiaud P; Ioannidis JPA
    BMC Med; 2018 Apr; 16(1):49. PubMed ID: 29615035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control.
    Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):568-83. PubMed ID: 17573688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing Meldonium: Assessing Soviet pragmatic alternatives to the randomized controlled trial.
    Chirkova A; Petrenko A; Vasilyev P
    Clin Trials; 2021 Jun; 18(3):269-276. PubMed ID: 33884909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Innovative designs of point-of-care comparative effectiveness trials.
    Shih MC; Turakhia M; Lai TL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):61-8. PubMed ID: 26099528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design: a valid and efficient alternative to pragmatic trials?
    van der Velden JM; Verkooijen HM; Young-Afat DA; Burbach JP; van Vulpen M; Relton C; van Gils CH; May AM; Groenwold RH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 46(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 27118559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Active-comparator design and new-user design in observational studies.
    Yoshida K; Solomon DH; Kim SC
    Nat Rev Rheumatol; 2015 Jul; 11(7):437-41. PubMed ID: 25800216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered?
    Mansouri A; Cooper B; Shin SM; Kondziolka D
    J Neurosurg; 2016 Feb; 124(2):558-68. PubMed ID: 26315006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
    Green AK; Reeder-Hayes KE; Corty RW; Basch E; Milowsky MI; Dusetzina SB; Bennett AV; Wood WA
    Oncologist; 2015 May; 20(5):464-e20. PubMed ID: 25876994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controls, comparator arms, and designs for critical care comparative effectiveness research: It's complicated.
    Ford VJ; Klein HG; Danner RL; Applefeld WN; Wang J; Cortes-Puch I; Eichacker PQ; Natanson C
    Clin Trials; 2024 Feb; 21(1):124-135. PubMed ID: 37615179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 6. Outcome measures in the real world.
    Welsing PM; Oude Rengerink K; Collier S; Eckert L; van Smeden M; Ciaglia A; Nachbaur G; Trelle S; Taylor AJ; Egger M; Goetz I;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():99-107. PubMed ID: 28502810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporating data from various trial designs into a mixed treatment comparison model.
    Schmitz S; Adams R; Walsh C
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(17):2935-49. PubMed ID: 23440610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.