168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27618594)
1. Estimation of contrast agent bolus arrival delays for improved reproducibility of liver DCE MRI.
Chouhan MD; Bainbridge A; Atkinson D; Punwani S; Mookerjee RP; Lythgoe MF; Taylor SA
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(19):6905-6918. PubMed ID: 27618594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved hepatic arterial fraction estimation using cardiac output correction of arterial input functions for liver DCE MRI.
Chouhan MD; Bainbridge A; Atkinson D; Punwani S; Mookerjee RP; Lythgoe MF; Taylor SA
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(4):1533-1546. PubMed ID: 28002045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of Caval Subtraction 2D Phase-Contrast MR Imaging to Measure Total Liver and Hepatic Arterial Blood Flow: Preclinical Validation and Initial Clinical Translation.
Chouhan MD; Mookerjee RP; Bainbridge A; Walker-Samuel S; Davies N; Halligan S; Lythgoe MF; Taylor SA
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):916-23. PubMed ID: 27171018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DCE-MRI of the liver: reconstruction of the arterial input function using a low dose pre-bolus contrast injection.
Jajamovich GH; Calcagno C; Dyvorne HA; Rusinek H; Taouli B
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115667. PubMed ID: 25546176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of two-compartment-exchange-model analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced mri incorporating bolus arrival time.
Nadav G; Liberman G; Artzi M; Kiryati N; Bashat DB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):237-249. PubMed ID: 27383624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DCE-MRI of the liver: effect of linear and nonlinear conversions on hepatic perfusion quantification and reproducibility.
Aronhime S; Calcagno C; Jajamovich GH; Dyvorne HA; Robson P; Dieterich D; Fiel MI; Martel-Laferriere V; Chatterji M; Rusinek H; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 24923476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Caval Subtraction 2D Phase-Contrast MRI to Measure Total Liver and Hepatic Arterial Blood Flow: Proof-of-Principle, Correlation With Portal Hypertension Severity and Validation in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease.
Chouhan MD; Mookerjee RP; Bainbridge A; Punwani S; Jones H; Davies N; Walker-Samuel S; Patch D; Jalan R; Halligan S; Lythgoe MF; Taylor SA
Invest Radiol; 2017 Mar; 52(3):170-176. PubMed ID: 27805917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Timing bolus dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI assessment of hepatic perfusion: Initial experience.
Baxter S; Wang ZJ; Joe BN; Qayyum A; Taouli B; Yeh BM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 29(6):1317-22. PubMed ID: 19472388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software.
Conte GM; Castellano A; Altabella L; Iadanza A; Cadioli M; Falini A; Anzalone N
Radiol Med; 2017 Apr; 122(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 28070841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of neuroendocrine liver metastases: a comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Armbruster M; Sourbron S; Haug A; Zech CJ; Ingrisch M; Auernhammer CJ; Nikolaou K; Paprottka PM; Rist C; Reiser MF; Sommer WH
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 24002080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI.
Singh A; Rathore RK; Haris M; Verma SK; Husain N; Gupta RK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 19097111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Quantitative Lung Perfusion Imaging Using the Dual-Bolus Approach: Comparison of 3 Contrast Agents and Recommendation of Feasible Doses.
Veldhoen S; Oechsner M; Fischer A; Weng AM; Kunz AS; Bley TA; Köstler H; Ritter CO
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 26606550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: Is there a correlation with flow and perfusion metrics obtained with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI?
Hectors SJ; Wagner M; Besa C; Bane O; Dyvorne HA; Fiel MI; Zhu H; Donovan M; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):856-64. PubMed ID: 26919327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of Perfusion Quantification with 3D Gradient Echo Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a Blood Pool Contrast Agent in Skeletal Swine Muscle.
Hindel S; Sauerbrey A; Maaß M; Maderwald S; Schlamann M; Lüdemann L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128060. PubMed ID: 26061498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of renal perfusion: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Winter JD; St Lawrence KS; Cheng HL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Sep; 34(3):608-15. PubMed ID: 21761490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility and Optimal Arterial Input Function Selection in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI in the Healthy Brain.
Cramer SP; Larsson HBW; Knudsen MH; Simonsen HJ; Vestergaard MB; Lindberg U
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Apr; 57(4):1229-1240. PubMed ID: 35993510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hepatic blood perfusion estimated by dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography in pigs: limitations of the slope method.
Winterdahl M; Sørensen M; Keiding S; Mortensen FV; Alstrup AK; Hansen SB; Munk OL
Invest Radiol; 2012 Oct; 47(10):588-95. PubMed ID: 22836307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
