These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children. Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the Presence of Spontaneous Components Affect the Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions? Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):990-1005. PubMed ID: 33480622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions in different age-groups of schoolchildren. Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Olszewski L; Skarzynski H Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1310-5. PubMed ID: 26092548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Otoacoustic emissions in neonates measured with different acquisition protocols. Jedrzejczak WW; Hatzopoulos S; Sliwa L; Pilka E; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 76(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 22266169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks. Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interrelation of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions. Gobsch H; Tietze G Hear Res; 1993 Sep; 69(1-2):176-81. PubMed ID: 8226338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Otoacoustic emissions in newborns evoked by 0.5kHz tone bursts. Jedrzejczak WW; Konopka W; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1522-6. PubMed ID: 26199137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aspects of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns. Kok MR; van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP Hear Res; 1993 Sep; 69(1-2):115-23. PubMed ID: 8226331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. McFadden D; Mishra R Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8113138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of atmospheric pressure variation on spontaneous, transiently evoked, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal human ears. Hauser R; Probst R; Harris FP Hear Res; 1993 Sep; 69(1-2):133-45. PubMed ID: 8226333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes. Ozturan O; Oysu C Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):129-36. PubMed ID: 9925024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of cochlear function in patients with tinnitus using spontaneous and transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions. Santaolalla Montoya F; Ibargüen AM; del Rey AS; Fernández JM J Otolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 36(5):296-302. PubMed ID: 17963669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects. Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Clinically Viable Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Assay Using Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions. Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Marshall L; Perez ZD; Villabona T Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):115-129. PubMed ID: 37475147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in humans with endolymphatic hydrops. Haginomori SI; Makimoto K; Tanaka H; Araki M; Takenaka H Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 11192908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]