These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27619067)

  • 1. Improving the performance of the PLB index for ligand-binding site prediction using dihedral angles and the solvent-accessible surface area.
    Cao C; Xu S
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():33232. PubMed ID: 27619067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein-ligand binding region prediction (PLB-SAVE) based on geometric features and CUDA acceleration.
    Lo YT; Wang HW; Pai TW; Tzou WS; Hsu HH; Chang HT
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S4. PubMed ID: 23514235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of amino acid composition to predict ligand-binding sites.
    Soga S; Shirai H; Kobori M; Hirayama N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):400-6. PubMed ID: 17243757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amino Acids in Nine Ligand-Prefer Ramachandran Regions.
    Cao C; Wang L; Chen X; Zou S; Wang G; Xu S
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():757495. PubMed ID: 26491686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding.
    Gunasekaran K; Nussinov R
    J Mol Biol; 2007 Jan; 365(1):257-73. PubMed ID: 17059826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction.
    Zhang Z; Li Y; Lin B; Schroeder M; Huang B
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 27(15):2083-8. PubMed ID: 21636590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction.
    Huang B
    OMICS; 2009 Aug; 13(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 19645590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting protein-ligand binding sites based on an improved geometric algorithm.
    He J; Wei DQ; Wang JF; Chou KC
    Protein Pept Lett; 2011 Oct; 18(10):997-1001. PubMed ID: 21592081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real value prediction of protein solvent accessibility using enhanced PSSM features.
    Chang DT; Huang HY; Syu YT; Wu CP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S12. PubMed ID: 19091011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of the druggable concavity in homology models using the PLB index.
    Soga S; Shirai H; Kobori M; Hirayama N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2287-92. PubMed ID: 17935312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ligand-binding site prediction using ligand-interacting and binding site-enriched protein triangles.
    Xie ZR; Hwang MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(12):1579-85. PubMed ID: 22495747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PatchSurfers: Two methods for local molecular property-based binding ligand prediction.
    Shin WH; Bures MG; Kihara D
    Methods; 2016 Jan; 93():41-50. PubMed ID: 26427548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the binding site structure of the PPAR gamma ligand-binding domain by computational solvent mapping.
    Sheu SH; Kaya T; Waxman DJ; Vajda S
    Biochemistry; 2005 Feb; 44(4):1193-209. PubMed ID: 15667213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the Coulomb/Accessible Surface Area solvent model for protein stability, ligand binding, and protein design.
    am Busch MS; Lopes A; Amara N; Bathelt C; Simonson T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 9():148. PubMed ID: 18366628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors.
    Chikhi R; Sael L; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2010 Jul; 78(9):2007-28. PubMed ID: 20455259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving prediction of secondary structure, local backbone angles, and solvent accessible surface area of proteins by iterative deep learning.
    Heffernan R; Paliwal K; Lyons J; Dehzangi A; Sharma A; Wang J; Sattar A; Yang Y; Zhou Y
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11476. PubMed ID: 26098304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation.
    Brylinski M; Skolnick J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18165317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tri-peptide reference structures for the calculation of relative solvent accessible surface area in protein amino acid residues.
    Topham CM; Smith JC
    Comput Biol Chem; 2015 Feb; 54():33-43. PubMed ID: 25544680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FunFOLDQA: a quality assessment tool for protein-ligand binding site residue predictions.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e38219. PubMed ID: 22666491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ProMate: a structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites.
    Neuvirth H; Raz R; Schreiber G
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 338(1):181-99. PubMed ID: 15050833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.