BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27619730)

  • 1. A special case of reduced rank models for identification and modelling of time varying effects in survival analysis.
    Perperoglou A
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(28):5135-5148. PubMed ID: 27619730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduced rank hazard regression with fixed and time-varying effects of the covariates.
    Perperoglou A
    Biom J; 2013 Jan; 55(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 23203917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduced-rank hazard regression for modelling non-proportional hazards.
    Perperoglou A; le Cessie S; van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2831-45. PubMed ID: 16158396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic Cox modelling based on fractional polynomials: time-variations in gastric cancer prognosis.
    Berger U; Schäfer J; Ulm K
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(7):1163-80. PubMed ID: 12652560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cox models with dynamic ridge penalties on time-varying effects of the covariates.
    Perperoglou A
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 23913655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new proposal for multivariable modelling of time-varying effects in survival data based on fractional polynomial time-transformation.
    Sauerbrei W; Royston P; Look M
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):453-73. PubMed ID: 17623349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parsimonious analysis of time-dependent effects in the Cox model.
    Lehr S; Schemper M
    Stat Med; 2007 Jun; 26(13):2686-98. PubMed ID: 17094129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using fractional polynomials and restricted cubic splines to model non-proportional hazards or time-varying covariate effects in the Cox regression model.
    Austin PC; Fang J; Lee DS
    Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(3):612-624. PubMed ID: 34806210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexible survival regression modelling.
    Cortese G; Scheike TH; Martinussen T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2010 Feb; 19(1):5-28. PubMed ID: 19608605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Joint modelling of repeated transitions in follow-up data--a case study on breast cancer data.
    Genser B; Wernecke KD
    Biom J; 2005 Jun; 47(3):388-401. PubMed ID: 16053262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival analysis with time-varying relative risks: a tree-based approach.
    Xu R; Adak S
    Methods Inf Med; 2001 May; 40(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 11424300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A fast routine for fitting Cox models with time varying effects of the covariates.
    Perperoglou A; le Cessie S; van Houwelingen HC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Feb; 81(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 16426701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-state model for studying an intermediate event using time-dependent covariates: application to breast cancer.
    Meier-Hirmer C; Schumacher M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jun; 13():80. PubMed ID: 23786493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time-varying coefficients in a multivariate frailty model: Application to breast cancer recurrences of several types and death.
    Mazroui Y; Mauguen A; Mathoulin-Pélissier S; MacGrogan G; Brouste V; Rondeau V
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2016 Apr; 22(2):191-215. PubMed ID: 25944225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects.
    Royston P; Parmar MK
    Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2175-97. PubMed ID: 12210632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Expectation Maximization algorithm for fitting the generalized odds-rate model to interval censored data.
    Zhou J; Zhang J; Lu W
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(7):1157-1171. PubMed ID: 28004414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Aalen's additive and Cox proportional hazards models for breast cancer survival: analysis of population- based data from British Columbia, Canada.
    Abadi A; Saadat S; Yavari P; Bajdik C; Jalili P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):3113-6. PubMed ID: 22393999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of procedures to assess non-linear and time-varying effects in multivariable models for survival data.
    Buchholz A; Sauerbrei W
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):308-31. PubMed ID: 21328605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trees and splines in survival analysis.
    Intrator O; Kooperberg C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1995 Sep; 4(3):237-61. PubMed ID: 8548105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A relative survival regression model using B-spline functions to model non-proportional hazards.
    Giorgi R; Abrahamowicz M; Quantin C; Bolard P; Esteve J; Gouvernet J; Faivre J
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2767-84. PubMed ID: 12939785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.