224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27619755)
1. What are GPs' preferences for financial and non-financial incentives in cancer screening? Evidence for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers.
Sicsic J; Krucien N; Franc C
Soc Sci Med; 2016 Oct; 167():116-27. PubMed ID: 27619755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [General practitioners’ preferences towards incentive measures linked with cancer screening].
Sicsic J; Franc C
Sante Publique; 2019; S2(HS2):33-41. PubMed ID: 32372577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Not Available].
Sicsic J; Franc C
Sante Publique; 2020; 2(HS2):33-41. PubMed ID: 35724226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of financial incentives on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening delivery rates: Results from a systematic literature review.
Mauro M; Rotundo G; Giancotti M
Health Policy; 2019 Dec; 123(12):1210-1220. PubMed ID: 31587819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retaining rural doctors: doctors' preferences for rural medical workforce incentives.
Li J; Scott A; McGrail M; Humphreys J; Witt J
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Nov; 121():56-64. PubMed ID: 25306410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013.
Mansfield C; Tangka FK; Ekwueme DU; Smith JL; Guy GP; Li C; Hauber AB
Prev Chronic Dis; 2016 Feb; 13():E27. PubMed ID: 26916898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010.
Menvielle G; Richard JB; Ringa V; Dray-Spira R; Beck F
Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 24842393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Women's Benefits and Harms Trade-Offs in Breast Cancer Screening: Results from a Discrete-Choice Experiment.
Sicsic J; Pelletier-Fleury N; Moumjid N
Value Health; 2018 Jan; 21(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 29304944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of financial factors in the mobility and location choices of General Practitioners in Australia.
McIsaac M; Scott A; Kalb G
Hum Resour Health; 2019 May; 17(1):34. PubMed ID: 31126294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France.
Berchi C; Dupuis JM; Launoy G
Eur J Health Econ; 2006 Jun; 7(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 16474967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do Financial Incentives Influence GPs' Decisions to Do After-hours Work? A Discrete Choice Labour Supply Model.
Broadway B; Kalb G; Li J; Scott A
Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 26(12):e52-e66. PubMed ID: 28217847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. General practitioners who never perform Pap smear: the medical offer and the socio-economic context around their office could limit their involvement in cervical cancer screening.
Maj C; Poncet L; Panjo H; Gautier A; Chauvin P; Menvielle G; Cadot E; Ringa V; Rigal L
BMC Fam Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 31416425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.
Lew JB; Feletto E; Wade S; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Nickson C; Simms KT; Procopio P; Taylor N; Worthington J; Smith D; Canfell K
Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter?
Vass CM; Rigby D; Payne K
Value Health; 2018 Feb; 21(2):219-228. PubMed ID: 29477404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Addition of Financial Incentives to Mailed Outreach for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Demb J; Mohan BP; Gupta S; Singh S
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2122581. PubMed ID: 34432010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists.
Raginel T; Grandazzi G; Launoy G; Trocmé M; Christophe V; Berchi C; Guittet L
BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Jul; 20(1):693. PubMed ID: 32718319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. General practitioners' preferences for future continuous professional development: evidence from a Danish discrete choice experiment.
Kjaer NK; Halling A; Pedersen LB
Educ Prim Care; 2015 Jan; 26(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 25654796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disengagement of general practitioners in cervical cancer screening.
Poncet L; Rigal L; Panjo H; Gautier A; Chauvin P; Menvielle G; Cadot E; Ringa V
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2016 Nov; 25(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 26628087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Patterns Among Women With Medicaid and Commercial Insurance.
Bonafede MM; Miller JD; Pohlman SK; Troeger KA; Sprague BL; Herschorn SD; Winer IH
Am J Prev Med; 2019 Sep; 57(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 31377088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Socioeconomic and healthcare use-related determinants of cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening practice in the French West Indies.
Menvielle G; Dugas J; Richard JB; Luce D
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 May; 27(3):269-273. PubMed ID: 27824663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
