These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27619755)
1. What are GPs' preferences for financial and non-financial incentives in cancer screening? Evidence for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Sicsic J; Krucien N; Franc C Soc Sci Med; 2016 Oct; 167():116-27. PubMed ID: 27619755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [General practitioners’ preferences towards incentive measures linked with cancer screening]. Sicsic J; Franc C Sante Publique; 2019; S2(HS2):33-41. PubMed ID: 32372577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Not Available]. Sicsic J; Franc C Sante Publique; 2020; 2(HS2):33-41. PubMed ID: 35724226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of financial incentives on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening delivery rates: Results from a systematic literature review. Mauro M; Rotundo G; Giancotti M Health Policy; 2019 Dec; 123(12):1210-1220. PubMed ID: 31587819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retaining rural doctors: doctors' preferences for rural medical workforce incentives. Li J; Scott A; McGrail M; Humphreys J; Witt J Soc Sci Med; 2014 Nov; 121():56-64. PubMed ID: 25306410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013. Mansfield C; Tangka FK; Ekwueme DU; Smith JL; Guy GP; Li C; Hauber AB Prev Chronic Dis; 2016 Feb; 13():E27. PubMed ID: 26916898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceptions and beliefs of general practitioners on their role in the cancer screening programmes in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study. Bongaerts THG; Büchner FL; Nierkens V; Crone MR; Guicherit OR; Numans ME BMC Prim Care; 2024 Apr; 25(1):129. PubMed ID: 38658815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010. Menvielle G; Richard JB; Ringa V; Dray-Spira R; Beck F Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 24842393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Women's Benefits and Harms Trade-Offs in Breast Cancer Screening: Results from a Discrete-Choice Experiment. Sicsic J; Pelletier-Fleury N; Moumjid N Value Health; 2018 Jan; 21(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 29304944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of financial factors in the mobility and location choices of General Practitioners in Australia. McIsaac M; Scott A; Kalb G Hum Resour Health; 2019 May; 17(1):34. PubMed ID: 31126294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France. Berchi C; Dupuis JM; Launoy G Eur J Health Econ; 2006 Jun; 7(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 16474967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do Financial Incentives Influence GPs' Decisions to Do After-hours Work? A Discrete Choice Labour Supply Model. Broadway B; Kalb G; Li J; Scott A Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 26(12):e52-e66. PubMed ID: 28217847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. General practitioners who never perform Pap smear: the medical offer and the socio-economic context around their office could limit their involvement in cervical cancer screening. Maj C; Poncet L; Panjo H; Gautier A; Chauvin P; Menvielle G; Cadot E; Ringa V; Rigal L BMC Fam Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 31416425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates. Lew JB; Feletto E; Wade S; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Nickson C; Simms KT; Procopio P; Taylor N; Worthington J; Smith D; Canfell K Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter? Vass CM; Rigby D; Payne K Value Health; 2018 Feb; 21(2):219-228. PubMed ID: 29477404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Addition of Financial Incentives to Mailed Outreach for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Facciorusso A; Demb J; Mohan BP; Gupta S; Singh S JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2122581. PubMed ID: 34432010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. General practitioners' preferences for future continuous professional development: evidence from a Danish discrete choice experiment. Kjaer NK; Halling A; Pedersen LB Educ Prim Care; 2015 Jan; 26(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 25654796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disengagement of general practitioners in cervical cancer screening. Poncet L; Rigal L; Panjo H; Gautier A; Chauvin P; Menvielle G; Cadot E; Ringa V Eur J Cancer Prev; 2016 Nov; 25(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 26628087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Patterns Among Women With Medicaid and Commercial Insurance. Bonafede MM; Miller JD; Pohlman SK; Troeger KA; Sprague BL; Herschorn SD; Winer IH Am J Prev Med; 2019 Sep; 57(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 31377088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Socioeconomic and healthcare use-related determinants of cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening practice in the French West Indies. Menvielle G; Dugas J; Richard JB; Luce D Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 May; 27(3):269-273. PubMed ID: 27824663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]