These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27619755)
21. Financial Incentives and Cervical Cancer Screening Participation in Ontario's Primary Care Practice Models. Pendrith C; Thind A; Zaric GS; Sarma S Healthc Policy; 2016 Aug; 12(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 27585031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Getting doctors into the bush: general practitioners' preferences for rural location. Scott A; Witt J; Humphreys J; Joyce C; Kalb G; Jeon SH; McGrail M Soc Sci Med; 2013 Nov; 96():33-44. PubMed ID: 24034949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists. Raginel T; Grandazzi G; Launoy G; Trocmé M; Christophe V; Berchi C; Guittet L BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Jul; 20(1):693. PubMed ID: 32718319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. General practitioners' perceptions of population based bowel screening and their influence on practice: a qualitative study. Dawson G; Crane M; Lyons C; Burnham A; Bowman T; Perez D; Travaglia J BMC Fam Pract; 2017 Mar; 18(1):36. PubMed ID: 28298185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The association between general practitioners' attitudes towards breast cancer screening and women's screening participation. Jensen LF; Mukai TO; Andersen B; Vedsted P BMC Cancer; 2012 Jun; 12():254. PubMed ID: 22708828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Breast cancer screening in France: results of the EDIFICE survey. Pivot X; Rixe O; Morere J; Coscas Y; Cals L; Namer M; Serin D; Dolbeault S; Eisinger F; Roussel C; Blay J Int J Med Sci; 2008 May; 5(3):106-12. PubMed ID: 18566655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Motivations and willingness of general practitioners in France to participate in primary care research as investigators. Ferrand Devouge E; Biard M; Beuzeboc J; Tavolacci MP; Schuers M Fam Pract; 2019 Oct; 36(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 30605509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Associations of multimorbidity with breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening delivery: a cross-sectional study of a nationally representative Japanese sample. Yamashita H; Takahashi Y; Ishizaki T; Imura H; Nakayama T Cancer Epidemiol; 2020 Dec; 69():101798. PubMed ID: 32980753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Unexplained variations in general practitioners' perceptions and practices regarding vaccination in France. Collange F; Zaytseva A; Pulcini C; Bocquier A; Verger P Eur J Public Health; 2019 Feb; 29(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 30085024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Demand for Cancer Screening Services: Results From Randomized Controlled Discrete Choice Experiments. Bilger M; Özdemir S; Finkelstein EA Value Health; 2020 Sep; 23(9):1246-1255. PubMed ID: 32940243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. General practitioners' preferences for the organisation of primary care: a discrete choice experiment. Pedersen LB; Kjær T; Kragstrup J; Gyrd-Hansen D Health Policy; 2012 Aug; 106(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 22487317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patient-centered medical home implementation and use of preventive services: the role of practice socioeconomic context. Markovitz AR; Alexander JA; Lantz PM; Paustian ML JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 175(4):598-606. PubMed ID: 25686468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer. Howard K; Salkeld G Value Health; 2009; 12(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 18657102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The age profile of the location decision of Australian general practitioners. Mu C Soc Sci Med; 2015 Oct; 142():183-93. PubMed ID: 26310594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Willingness, concerns, incentives and acceptable remuneration regarding an involvement in teaching undergraduates - a cross-sectional questionnaire survey among German GPs. Deutsch T; Winter M; Lippmann S; Geier AK; Braun K; Frese T BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jan; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 30683085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Colorectal cancer screening practise is influenced by ethnicity of medical practitioner and patient. Koo JH; You MY; Liu K; Athureliya MD; Tang CW; Redmond DM; Connor SJ; Leong RW J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Feb; 27(2):390-6. PubMed ID: 21793910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of presenting information about invasive follow-up testing on individuals' noninvasive colorectal cancer screening participation decision: results from a discrete choice experiment. Benning TM; Dellaert BG; Severens JL; Dirksen CD Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):578-87. PubMed ID: 25128051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Preferences for interventions designed to increase cervical screening uptake in non-attending young women: How findings from a discrete choice experiment compare with observed behaviours in a trial. Campbell HE; Gray AM; Watson J; Jackson C; Moseley C; Cruickshank ME; Kitchener HC; Rivero-Arias O Health Expect; 2020 Feb; 23(1):202-211. PubMed ID: 31659850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. General Practitioners' perceptions of their role in cancer care and factors which influence this role. Mitchell GK; Burridge LH; Colquist SP; Love A Health Soc Care Community; 2012 Nov; 20(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 22804847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]