BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27619773)

  • 1. Impact of gonadotropin type on progesterone elevation during ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist cycles.
    Lawrenz B; Beligotti F; Engelmann N; Gates D; Fatemi HM
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2554-2560. PubMed ID: 27619773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol: RCT including 1050 first IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Bryndorf T; Løssl K; Roskær J; Holland T; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1253-64. PubMed ID: 27060174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Basal serum progesterone and history of elevated progesterone on the day of hCG administration are significant predictors of late follicular progesterone elevation in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles.
    Venetis CA; Kolibianakis EM; Bosdou JK; Lainas GT; Sfontouris IA; Tarlatzis BC; Lainas TG
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1859-65. PubMed ID: 27301360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Administration of corifollitropin alfa on Day 2 versus Day 4 of the cycle in a GnRH antagonist protocol: a randomized controlled pilot study.
    Blockeel C; Polyzos NP; Derksen L; De Brucker M; Vloeberghs V; van de Vijver A; De Vos M; Tournaye H
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1500-7. PubMed ID: 24813196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Drakopoulos P; Vuong TNL; Ho NAV; Vaiarelli A; Ho MT; Blockeel C; Camus M; Lam AT; van de Vijver A; Humaidan P; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2225-2233. PubMed ID: 29040589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Daily low-dose hCG stimulation during the luteal phase combined with GnRHa triggered IVF cycles without exogenous progesterone: a proof of concept trial.
    Andersen CY; Elbaek HO; Alsbjerg B; Laursen RJ; Povlsen BB; Thomsen L; Humaidan P
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2387-95. PubMed ID: 26209535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of early versus late initiation of GnRH antagonist co-treatment for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hamdine O; Macklon NS; Eijkemans MJ; Laven JS; Cohlen BJ; Verhoeff A; van Dop PA; Bernardus RE; Lambalk CB; Oosterhuis GJ; Holleboom CA; van den Dool-Maasland GC; Verburg HJ; van der Heijden PF; Blankhart A; Fauser BC; Broekmans FJ;
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3227-35. PubMed ID: 24129613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial.
    Vuong TN; Phung HT; Ho MT
    Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1188-95. PubMed ID: 25740882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recombinant LH supplementation to a standard GnRH antagonist protocol in women of 35 years or older undergoing IVF/ICSI: a randomized controlled multicentre study.
    König TE; van der Houwen LE; Overbeek A; Hendriks ML; Beutler-Beemsterboer SN; Kuchenbecker WK; Renckens CN; Bernardus RE; Schats R; Homburg R; Hompes PG; Lambalk CB
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2804-12. PubMed ID: 23838159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large, comparative, randomized double-blind trial confirming noninferiority of pregnancy rates for corifollitropin alfa compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in older patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Boostanfar R; Shapiro B; Levy M; Rosenwaks Z; Witjes H; Stegmann BJ; Elbers J; Gordon K; Mannaerts B;
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jul; 104(1):94-103.e1. PubMed ID: 26003273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic models for high and low ovarian responses in controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol.
    Broekmans FJ; Verweij PJ; Eijkemans MJ; Mannaerts BM; Witjes H
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1688-97. PubMed ID: 24903202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Serum progesterone is lower in ovarian stimulation with highly purified HMG compared to recombinant FSH owing to a different regulation of follicular steroidogenesis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bosch E; Alamá P; Romero JL; Marí M; Labarta E; Pellicer A
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Feb; 39(2):393-402. PubMed ID: 38037188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Live birth rates after modified natural cycle compared with high-dose FSH stimulation using GnRH antagonists in poor responders.
    Lainas TG; Sfontouris IA; Venetis CA; Lainas GT; Zorzovilis IZ; Tarlatzis BC; Kolibianakis EM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 26307091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol.
    Devroey P; Boostanfar R; Koper NP; Mannaerts BM; Ijzerman-Boon PC; Fauser BC;
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Dec; 24(12):3063-72. PubMed ID: 19684043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of polymorphisms in FSHR gene on late follicular phase progesterone and estradiol serum levels in predicted normoresponders.
    Neves AR; Vuong NL; Blockeel C; Garcia S; Alviggi C; Spits C; Ma PQM; Ho MT; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 37(11):2646-2654. PubMed ID: 36069495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ovarian response and embryo ploidy following oral micronized progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol. A prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.
    Vidal MDM; Martínez F; Rodríguez I; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):1098-1104. PubMed ID: 38498835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Patients Treated with Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH in a GnRH Antagonist Protocol.
    Griesinger G; Verweij PJ; Gates D; Devroey P; Gordon K; Stegmann BJ; Tarlatzis BC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149615. PubMed ID: 26950065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of blastocyst euploidy rates following luteal versus follicular phase stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol: a prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.
    Martinez F; Clua E; Roca M; Garcia S; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2777-2786. PubMed ID: 36269092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eight weeks of androgen priming by daily low-dose hCG injections before ICSI treatment in women with low ovarian reserve.
    Friis Wang N; Bogstad JW; Pors SE; Petersen MR; Pinborg A; Yding Andersen C; Løssl K
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Apr; 38(4):716-725. PubMed ID: 36721920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.