BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27619774)

  • 1. Embryo selection using time-lapse analysis (Early Embryo Viability Assessment) in conjunction with standard morphology: a prospective two-center pilot study.
    Kieslinger DC; De Gheselle S; Lambalk CB; De Sutter P; Kostelijk EH; Twisk JW; van Rijswijk J; Van den Abbeel E; Vergouw CG
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2450-2457. PubMed ID: 27619774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial.
    Conaghan J; Chen AA; Willman SP; Ivani K; Chenette PE; Boostanfar R; Baker VL; Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Gvakharia M; Loewke KE; Shen S
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):412-9.e5. PubMed ID: 23721712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A pilot randomized controlled trial of Day 3 single embryo transfer with adjunctive time-lapse selection versus Day 5 single embryo transfer with or without adjunctive time-lapse selection.
    Kaser DJ; Bormann CL; Missmer SA; Farland LV; Ginsburg ES; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1598-1603. PubMed ID: 28854588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro maturation is associated with increased early embryo arrest without impairing morphokinetic development of useable embryos progressing to blastocysts.
    Walls ML; Ryan JP; Keelan JA; Hart R
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1842-9. PubMed ID: 26040479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
    Yang L; Cai S; Zhang S; Kong X; Gu Y; Lu C; Dai J; Gong F; Lu G; Lin G
    Hum Reprod; 2018 May; 33(5):869-876. PubMed ID: 29546361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.
    Minasi MG; Colasante A; Riccio T; Ruberti A; Casciani V; Scarselli F; Spinella F; Fiorentino F; Varricchio MT; Greco E
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2245-54. PubMed ID: 27591227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo.
    Kaser DJ; Farland LV; Missmer SA; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1604-1611. PubMed ID: 28854587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation.
    Aparicio-Ruiz B; Basile N; Pérez Albalá S; Bronet F; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1379-1385.e10. PubMed ID: 27530063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in gene expression profiles between human preimplantation embryos cultured in two different IVF culture media.
    Kleijkers SH; Eijssen LM; Coonen E; Derhaag JG; Mantikou E; Jonker MJ; Mastenbroek S; Repping S; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC; van Montfoort AP
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2303-11. PubMed ID: 26202924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A propensity score-based, comparative study assessing humid and dry time-lapse incubation, with single-step medium, on embryo development and clinical outcomes.
    Valera MÁ; Albert C; Marcos J; Larreategui Z; Bori L; Meseguer M
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Aug; 37(9):1980-1993. PubMed ID: 35904473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Day 3 embryo selection by metabolomic profiling of culture medium with near-infrared spectroscopy as an adjunct to morphology: a randomized controlled trial.
    Vergouw CG; Kieslinger DC; Kostelijk EH; Botros LL; Schats R; Hompes PG; Sakkas D; Lambalk CB
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Aug; 27(8):2304-11. PubMed ID: 22647453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth?
    Barberet J; Bruno C; Valot E; Antunes-Nunes C; Jonval L; Chammas J; Choux C; Ginod P; Sagot P; Soudry-Faure A; Fauque P
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 31287145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time-lapse parameters as predictors of blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome in embryos from good prognosis patients: a prospective cohort study.
    Kirkegaard K; Kesmodel US; Hindkjær JJ; Ingerslev HJ
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2643-51. PubMed ID: 23900207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a new clinically applicable device for embryo evaluation which measures embryo oxygen consumption.
    Kurosawa H; Utsunomiya H; Shiga N; Takahashi A; Ihara M; Ishibashi M; Nishimoto M; Watanabe Z; Abe H; Kumagai J; Terada Y; Igarashi H; Takahashi T; Fukui A; Suganuma R; Tachibana M; Yaegashi N
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 27609982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
    Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A double-blind randomized controlled trial investigating a time-lapse algorithm for selecting Day 5 blastocysts for transfer.
    Ahlström A; Lundin K; Lind AK; Gunnarsson K; Westlander G; Park H; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Thorsteinsdottir SA; Einarsson S; Åström M; Löfdahl K; Menezes J; Callender S; Nyberg C; Winerdal J; Stenfelt C; Jonassen BR; Oldereid N; Nolte L; Sundler M; Hardarson T
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Apr; 37(4):708-717. PubMed ID: 35143661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No benefit of culturing embryos in a closed system compared with a conventional incubator in terms of number of good quality embryos: results from an RCT.
    Park H; Bergh C; Selleskog U; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Lundin K
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 25432920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin.
    Kirkegaard K; Sundvall L; Erlandsen M; Hindkjær JJ; Knudsen UB; Ingerslev HJ
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 26637491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection.
    Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Palao L; Witmer J; Palao LM; Gvakharia M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):369-75.e6. PubMed ID: 26604069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development.
    Simon L; Murphy K; Shamsi MB; Liu L; Emery B; Aston KI; Hotaling J; Carrell DT
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2402-12. PubMed ID: 25205757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.