These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27620075)

  • 41. Self-paced study time as a cue for recall predictions across school age.
    Hoffmann-Biencourt A; Lockl K; Schneider W; Ackerman R; Koriat A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 28(Pt 4):767-84. PubMed ID: 21121466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance: Positive, negative, or both?
    Janes JL; Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 29611141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cue integration in metamemory judgements is strategic.
    Undorf M; Bröder A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):629-642. PubMed ID: 31561744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Judgements of relative direction: the effect of task instructions on spatial recall.
    Donaldson P; Tlauka M; Robertson C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jun; 66(6):1090-103. PubMed ID: 23057609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Metacognitive judgments-of-learning in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.
    Wojcik DZ; Waterman AH; Lestié C; Moulin CJ; Souchay C
    Autism; 2014 May; 18(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 24151127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Congruity influences memory and judgments of learning during survival processing.
    Palmore CC; Garcia AD; Bacon LP; Johnson CA; Kelemen WL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Feb; 19(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 22101573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Aging and recollection in the accuracy of judgments of learning.
    Daniels KA; Toth JP; Hertzog C
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Jun; 24(2):494-500. PubMed ID: 19485665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning.
    Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA
    Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Do age-related differences in episodic feeling of knowing accuracy depend on the timing of the judgement?
    Maclaverty SN; Hertzog C
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):860-73. PubMed ID: 19882437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention.
    Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):976-88. PubMed ID: 22399224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An ERP study on metacognitive monitoring processes in children.
    Tsalas NRH; Müller BCN; Meinhardt J; Proust J; Paulus M; Sodian B
    Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 1695():84-90. PubMed ID: 29852136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
    Geraci L; Manzano I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Judgments of learning: evidence for a two-stage process.
    Son LK; Metcalfe J
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1116-29. PubMed ID: 16496730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. When disfluency is--and is not--a desirable difficulty: the influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory.
    Yue CL; Castel AD; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 22976883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Parietal lesion effects on cued recall following pair associate learning.
    Ben-Zvi S; Soroker N; Levy DA
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 73():176-94. PubMed ID: 25998492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Picture-perfect is not perfect for metamemory: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with degraded images.
    Besken M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1417-33. PubMed ID: 26844578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Does the amount of material to be remembered influence judgements of learning (JOLs)?
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Memory; 2010 Apr; 18(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 20408044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
    Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.