BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

719 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27620683)

  • 1. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
    Ioannidis JP
    Milbank Q; 2016 Sep; 94(3):485-514. PubMed ID: 27620683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
    Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Network meta-analyses performed by contracting companies and commissioned by industry.
    Schuit E; Ioannidis JP
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):198. PubMed ID: 27884175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews.
    Hartling L; Featherstone R; Nuspl M; Shave K; Dryden DM; Vandermeer B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28420349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analyses with industry involvement are massively published and report no caveats for antidepressants.
    Ebrahim S; Bance S; Athale A; Malachowski C; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():155-63. PubMed ID: 26399904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Topics and PRISMA Checklist Compliance for Meta-analyses in Dermatology: Journal Case Study.
    Poveda-Montoyo I; Belinchón-Romero I; Romero-Pérez D; Ramos-Rincón JM
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2019 Dec; 27(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 31969243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
    Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disorganized Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Time to Systematize the Conduct and Publication of These Study Overviews?
    Riaz IB; Khan MS; Riaz H; Goldberg RJ
    Am J Med; 2016 Mar; 129(3):339.e11-8. PubMed ID: 26522792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals].
    Liu JP; Xia Y
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 27(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 17526167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.
    Hennessy EA; Tanner-Smith EE; Finch AJ; Sathe N; Kugley S
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-86. PubMed ID: 37131375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias.
    Knobloch K; Yoon U; Vogt PM
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(2):91-2. PubMed ID: 21145753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.
    Anglemyer A; Horvath HT; Bero L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Apr; 2014(4):MR000034. PubMed ID: 24782322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.