BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

719 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27620683)

  • 21. Systematic reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
    Yuan Y; Hunt RH
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1086-92. PubMed ID: 19417748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Publication bias and meta-analyses: a practical example.
    Burdett S; Stewart LA; Tierney JF
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 12701945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
    Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
    J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study.
    Jüni P; Holenstein F; Sterne J; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 31(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 11914306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The contribution of systematic reviews to the practice of pediatric nephrology.
    Hodson E; Craig JC
    Pediatr Nephrol; 2013 Feb; 28(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 22476252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beneficial and harmful effects of antidepressants versus placebo, 'active placebo', or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a protocol for a systematic review of published and unpublished data with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.
    Juul S; Siddiqui F; Barbateskovic M; Jørgensen CK; Hengartner MP; Kirsch I; Gluud C; Jakobsen JC
    Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):154. PubMed ID: 34034811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of antidepressants effect on low back pain using updated AMSTAR.
    Panahi MH; Mohseni M; Bidhendi Yarandi R; Ramezani Tehrani F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):14. PubMed ID: 31973739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Haase SC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Feb; 127(2):955-966. PubMed ID: 21285802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Zhang JH; Shang HC; Zhang BL
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Apr; 6(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 18405597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Concordance between systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in assisted reproduction: an overview.
    Mascarenhas M; Kalampokas T; Sunkara SK; Kamath MS
    Hum Reprod Open; 2020; 2020(4):hoaa058. PubMed ID: 33381658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relationship of publication language, study population, risk of bias, and treatment effects in acupuncture related systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Li J; Hui X; Yao L; Shi A; Yan P; Yao Y; Wang Q; Ma Y; Wei D; Lan L; Chen L; Yan L; Fang F; Li H; Feng X; Wu J; Qiao Y; Zhang W; Esill J; Qiao C; Yang K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):96. PubMed ID: 37081403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinician-targeted interventions to influence antibiotic prescribing behaviour for acute respiratory infections in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews.
    Tonkin-Crine SK; Tan PS; van Hecke O; Wang K; Roberts NW; McCullough A; Hansen MP; Butler CC; Del Mar CB
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 9(9):CD012252. PubMed ID: 28881002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.
    Deeks JJ; Dinnes J; D'Amico R; Sowden AJ; Sakarovitch C; Song F; Petticrew M; Altman DG; ;
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(27):iii-x, 1-173. PubMed ID: 14499048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
    Sbidian E; Chaimani A; Garcia-Doval I; Doney L; Dressler C; Hua C; Hughes C; Naldi L; Afach S; Le Cleach L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Apr; 4(4):CD011535. PubMed ID: 33871055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.