180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27620867)
1. Variability in residual feed intake and nutrient utilization in Murrah buffalo heifers.
Negesse T; Datt C; Kundu SS
Trop Anim Health Prod; 2016 Dec; 48(8):1577-1584. PubMed ID: 27620867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Buffalo heifers selected for lower residual feed intake have lower feed intake, better dietary nitrogen utilisation and reduced enteric methane production.
Sharma VK; Kundu SS; Datt C; Prusty S; Kumar M; Sontakke UB
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2018 Apr; 102(2):e607-e614. PubMed ID: 29027698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nutrient utilisation, growth performance and blood metabolites in Murrah buffalo calves (Bubalus bubalis) divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Sharma VK; Kundu SS; Prusty S; Datt C; Kumar M
Arch Anim Nutr; 2016 Dec; 70(6):455-69. PubMed ID: 27666680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Residual feed intake as a feed efficiency selection tool and its relationship with feed intake, performance and nutrient utilization in Murrah buffalo calves.
Subhashchandra Bose BK; Kundu SS; Tho NT; Sharma VK; Sontakke UB
Trop Anim Health Prod; 2014 Apr; 46(4):615-21. PubMed ID: 24563229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of residual feed intake and dam body weight on replacement heifer intake, efficiency, performance, and metabolic response.
Walker RS; Martin RM; Buttrey B
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3602-12. PubMed ID: 26440028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grazed grass herbage intake and performance of beef heifers with predetermined phenotypic residual feed intake classification.
Lawrence P; Kenny DA; Earley B; McGee M
Animal; 2012 Oct; 6(10):1648-61. PubMed ID: 23031564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hot topic: Selecting cattle for low residual feed intake did not affect daily methane production but increased methane yield.
Flay HE; Kuhn-Sherlock B; Macdonald KA; Camara M; Lopez-Villalobos N; Donaghy DJ; Roche JR
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2708-2713. PubMed ID: 30639015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of divergence in phenotypic residual feed intake on methane emissions, ruminal fermentation, and apparent whole-tract digestibility of beef heifers across three contrasting diets.
McDonnell RP; Hart KJ; Boland TM; Kelly AK; McGee M; Kenny DA
J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):1179-93. PubMed ID: 27065279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of feed efficiency, carcass ultrasound, feeding behavior, and blood metabolic variables in finishing heifers divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Kelly AK; McGee M; Crews DH; Sweeney T; Boland TM; Kenny DA
J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3214-25. PubMed ID: 20525931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of residual feed intake classification on forage intake by grazing beef cows.
Meyer AM; Kerley MS; Kallenbach RL
J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2670-9. PubMed ID: 18407991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle.
Nkrumah JD; Okine EK; Mathison GW; Schmid K; Li C; Basarab JA; Price MA; Wang Z; Moore SS
J Anim Sci; 2006 Jan; 84(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 16361501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between feeding behavior and residual feed intake in growing Brangus heifers.
Bingham GM; Friend TH; Lancaster PA; Carstens GE
J Anim Sci; 2009 Aug; 87(8):2685-9. PubMed ID: 19395511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationships among performance, residual feed intake, and temperament assessed in growing beef heifers and subsequently as 3-year-old, lactating beef cows.
Black TE; Bischoff KM; Mercadante VR; Marquezini GH; Dilorenzo N; Chase CC; Coleman SW; Maddock TD; Lamb GC
J Anim Sci; 2013 May; 91(5):2254-63. PubMed ID: 23463567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers.
Kelly AK; McGee M; Crews DH; Fahey AG; Wylie AR; Kenny DA
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):109-23. PubMed ID: 19820067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utilization of macrominerals and trace elements in pregnant heifers with distinct feed efficiencies.
Dias RS; Montanholi YR; Lopez S; Smith B; Miller SP; France J
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jul; 99(7):5413-5421. PubMed ID: 27108170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Grass silage intake, rumen and blood variables, ultrasonic and body measurements, feeding behavior, and activity in pregnant beef heifers differing in phenotypic residual feed intake.
Lawrence P; Kenny DA; Earley B; Crews DH; McGee M
J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):3248-61. PubMed ID: 21622881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance, residual feed intake, digestibility, carcass traits, and profitability of Angus-Hereford steers housed in individual or group pens.
Cruz GD; RodrÃguez-Sánchez JA; Oltjen JW; Sainz RD
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):324-9. PubMed ID: 19749019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved nutrient digestibility and retention partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected for low residual feed intake.
Harris AJ; Patience JF; Lonergan SM; J M Dekkers C; Gabler NK
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90 Suppl 4():164-6. PubMed ID: 23365317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nutrient utilisation and methane emissions in Sahiwal calves differing in residual feed intake.
Sharma VC; Mahesh MS; Mohini M; Datt C; Nampoothiri VM
Arch Anim Nutr; 2014; 68(5):345-57. PubMed ID: 25156936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phenotypic and genetic relationships of residual feed intake with performance and ultrasound carcass traits in Brangus heifers.
Lancaster PA; Carstens GE; Crews DH; Welsh TH; Forbes TD; Forrest DW; Tedeschi LO; Randel RD; Rouquette FM
J Anim Sci; 2009 Dec; 87(12):3887-96. PubMed ID: 19717782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
