These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2762095)
21. A Mueller-Lyer illusion induced by selective attention. Tsal Y Q J Exp Psychol A; 1984 May; 36(2):319-33. PubMed ID: 6533690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of changes in fin-length on apparent shaft-length and depth in the Müller-Lyer illusion. Jaeger T Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1178436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The components of the standard and reverse Müller-Lyer illusions. Worrall N; Firth D Q J Exp Psychol; 1974 Aug; 26(Pt3):342-54. PubMed ID: 4416131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. New depth to the Müller-Lyer illusion. Glennerster A; Rogers BJ Perception; 1993; 22(6):691-704. PubMed ID: 8255699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Control stimuli in investigations of the acute-angled and obtuse-angled Müller-Lyer illusions. Adam J; Bateman L Perception; 1980; 9(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 7422463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assimilation theory, attention, and asymmetry in Müller-Lyer illusions: quantitative predictions. Pressey AW Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Oct; 119(2):509-29. PubMed ID: 25349892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Müller-Lyer illusion explained by the statistics of image-source relationships. Howe CQ; Purves D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Jan; 102(4):1234-9. PubMed ID: 15657142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Perception of eye scans with the Müller-Lyer stimuli: evidence for filter theory. Petersik JT Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Jun; 54(3):683-92. PubMed ID: 7099878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Complexity of context and orientation of figure in the corridor illusion. Fineman MB Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 7290859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The two illusions of Müller-Lyer: confusion theory reexamined. Sekuler R; Erlebacher A Am J Psychol; 1971 Dec; 84(4):477-86. PubMed ID: 5142060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dynamic presentation boosts the Ebbinghaus illusion but reduces the Müller-Lyer and orientation contrast illusions. Takao S; Watanabe K; Cavanagh P J Vis; 2021 Jun; 21(6):4. PubMed ID: 34110368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used. Foster RM; Franz VH Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantification of the Müller-Lyer illusion using signal detection theory. Lown BA Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):101-2. PubMed ID: 3211658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Inappropriate constancy scaling as a factor in the Müller-Lyer illusion. Morrison LC Br J Psychol; 1977 Feb; 68(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 851698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Müller-Lyer illusion decrement as related to adaptation preceding negative aftereffect: correlational analysis. Swisher CW; Mandes E Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Aug; 39(1 Pt 2):377-8. PubMed ID: 4421790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Assimilation theory, attentive fields, and the Müller-Lyer illusion. Bross M; Blair R; Longtin P Perception; 1978; 7(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 693229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Age, ability and positioning variables influencing pupils' judgments of the size of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Simon A; Ward LO Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):1339-43. PubMed ID: 4416979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Emmert's law in the Ames room. Dwyer J; Ashton R; Broerse J Perception; 1990; 19(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 2336333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]