These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2762105)

  • 1. Higher formant normalization results from auditory integration of F2 and F3.
    Johnson K
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 2762105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perception of back vowels: centre of gravity hypothesis.
    Assmann PF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):423-48. PubMed ID: 1775650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic correlates of the front/back vowel distinction: a comparison of transition onset versus "steady state".
    Sussman HM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 2380450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels.
    Syrdal AK; Gopal HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1086-100. PubMed ID: 3700864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coherence masking protection in speech sounds: the role of formant synchrony.
    Gordon PC
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 9055618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic source characteristics, across-formant integration, and speech intelligibility under competitive conditions.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):680-91. PubMed ID: 25751040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory Sensitivity to Formant Ratios:Toward an Account of Vowel Normalization.
    Monahan PJ; Idsardi WJ
    Lang Cogn Process; 2010 Jul; 25(6):808-839. PubMed ID: 20606713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vowel discrimination in cats: thresholds for the detection of second formant changes in the vowel /epsilon/.
    Hienz RD; Aleszczyk CM; May BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1052-8. PubMed ID: 8759958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the effectiveness of whole spectral shape for vowel perception.
    Ito M; Tsuchida J; Yano M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1141-9. PubMed ID: 11519581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multidimensional scaling analysis of vowel discrimination in humans and monkeys.
    Sinnott JM; Brown CH; Malik WT; Kressley RA
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1214-24. PubMed ID: 9401456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels.
    Kewley-Port D; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):485-96. PubMed ID: 8120259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Difference limens for formant patterns of vowel sounds.
    Hawks JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1074-84. PubMed ID: 8132901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Across-formant integration and speech intelligibility: Effects of acoustic source properties in the presence and absence of a contralateral interferer.
    Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1227. PubMed ID: 27586751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory spectral integration in the perception of static vowels.
    Fox RA; Jacewicz E; Chang CY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1667-81. PubMed ID: 21862680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Formant-frequency variation and its effects on across-formant grouping in speech perception.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():323-31. PubMed ID: 23716238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Formant frequencies in Middle Eastern singers.
    Hamdan AL; Tabri D; Deeb R; Rifai H; Rameh C; Fuleihan N
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2008; 29(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 18439952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information for coarticulation: Static signal properties or formant dynamics?
    Viswanathan N; Magnuson JS; Fowler CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1228-36. PubMed ID: 24730744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory normalization of French vowels synthesized by an articulatory model simulating growth from birth to adulthood.
    Ménard L; Schwartz JL; Boë LJ; Kandel S; Vallée N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1892-905. PubMed ID: 12002872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.