559 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27621195)
21. A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy.
Wang J; Li X; Wu H; Zhang Y; Wang F
Dis Markers; 2020; 2020():2503753. PubMed ID: 32454902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review.
Gaia G; Holloway RW; Santoro L; Ahmad S; Di Silverio E; Spinillo A
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 116(6):1422-1431. PubMed ID: 21099613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy seems safe in women with early-stage endometrial cancer.
Herling SF; Havemann MC; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T
Dan Med J; 2015 Aug; 62(8):A5109. PubMed ID: 26239585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
Herling SF
Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Feasibility and Perioperative Outcomes.
Fanfani F; Restaino S; Gueli Alletti S; Fagotti A; Monterossi G; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1011-7. PubMed ID: 25982854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer.
Herling SF; Møller AM; Palle C; Grynnerup A; Thomsen T
Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.
Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.
Torng PL; Pan SP; Hwang JS; Shih HJ; Chen CL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):781-787. PubMed ID: 29241920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.
Bourgin C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 27955835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy].
Lan X; Xi H; Zhang K; Cui J; Li M; Chen L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):184-189. PubMed ID: 28226353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Staging for Early Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Matched Control Study.
Gallotta V; Cicero C; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Petrillo M; Fagotti A; Chiantera V; Costantini B; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):293-298. PubMed ID: 27856387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
