These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27621219)

  • 21. Evaluation of COSHH Essentials for vapour degreasing and bag-filling operations.
    Evans P; Garrod A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Aug; 50(6):641. PubMed ID: 16916884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Control banding assessment of workers' exposure to indium and its compounds in 13 Japanese indium plants.
    Higashikubo I; Arito H; Ando K; Araki A; Shimizu H; Sakurai H
    J Occup Health; 2018 May; 60(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 29563364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Occupational exposure limits for chemicals.
    Topping M
    Occup Environ Med; 2001 Feb; 58(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 11160994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the exposure prediction component of Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Essentials.
    Kimbrough LJ; Oestenstad RK; Beasley TM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2020; 17(2-3):97-108. PubMed ID: 32049607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Control banding for risk management of source chemical agents and other occupational hazards.
    Chalupka S
    AAOHN J; 2010 Sep; 58(9):404. PubMed ID: 20839730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The changes in hazard classification and product notification procedures of the new European CLP and Cosmetics Regulations.
    de Groot R; Brekelmans P; Herremans J; Meulenbelt J
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2010 Jan; 48(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 20055632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of factors affecting containment with extracted partial enclosures using computational fluid dynamics.
    Batt RL; Kelsey A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):227-40. PubMed ID: 24232543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transformation/dissolution characteristics of a nickel matte and nickel concentrates for acute and chronic hazard classification.
    Skeaff JM; Beaudoin R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Jan; 11(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 25103894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the control banding method--comparison with measurement-based comprehensive risk assessment.
    Hashimoto H; Goto T; Nakachi N; Suzuki H; Takebayashi T; Kajiki S; Mori K
    J Occup Health; 2007 Nov; 49(6):482-92. PubMed ID: 18075208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Review and Improvement of Chemical Hazard Risk Management of Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency.
    Shin S; Byeon SH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(17):. PubMed ID: 34501985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Occupational hygiene considerations in the development of a structured approach to select chemical control strategies.
    Maidment SC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1998 Aug; 42(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 9738436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Recent prevention strategies and occupational risk analysis: Control Banding and Sobane].
    Ghittori S; Ferrari M; Negri S; Serranti P; Sacco P; Biffi R; Imbriani M
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2006; 28(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 16705887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the utility and reliability of COSHH Essentials.
    Money C; Bailey S; Smith M; Hay A; Hudspith B; Tolley D; Dobbie J; Jackson H
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Aug; 50(6):642-3; author reply 643-4. PubMed ID: 16844718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An introduction to a UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals.
    Russell RM; Maidment SC; Brooke I; Topping MD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1998 Aug; 42(6):367-76. PubMed ID: 9738434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Training health and safety committees to use control banding: lessons learned and opportunities for the United States.
    Bracker AL; Morse TF; Simcox NJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 May; 6(5):307-14. PubMed ID: 19283620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A GHS-consistent approach to health hazard classification of petroleum substances, a class of UVCB substances.
    Clark CR; McKee RH; Freeman JJ; Swick D; Mahagaokar S; Pigram G; Roberts LG; Smulders CJ; Beatty PW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 24025648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Predictive models for the assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals: a new challenge for employers].
    Gromiec JP; Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Jankowska A; Czerczak S
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(5):699-716. PubMed ID: 24502133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Application of the Draft NIOSH Occupational Exposure Banding Process to Bisphenol A: A case study.
    Hines CJ; Lentz TJ; McKernan L; Rane P; Whittaker C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Feb; 16(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 30457492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. COSHH (Control of Substances Hazardous to Health)--the priorities for the NHS.
    Waterman L
    Health Estate J; 1992 Mar; 46(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10118214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals: toxicological considerations.
    Brooke IM
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1998 Aug; 42(6):377-90. PubMed ID: 9738435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.