178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27623617)
1. Genomic prediction using models with dominance and imprinting effects for backfat thickness and average daily gain in Danish Duroc pigs.
Guo X; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Wang Y; Lund MS; Su G
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):67. PubMed ID: 27623617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
Su G; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Henryon M; Lund MS
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45293. PubMed ID: 23028912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data.
Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2629-37. PubMed ID: 26438289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic prediction of growth in pigs based on a model including additive and dominance effects.
Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 26676611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs.
González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Carillier-Jacquin C; Bouquet A; Vitezica ZG
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):55. PubMed ID: 31558151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impacts of additive, dominance, and inbreeding depression effects on genomic evaluation by combining two SNP chips in Canadian Yorkshire pigs bred in China.
Mei Q; Vitezica ZG; Li J; Zhao S; Legarra A; Xiang T
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Oct; 54(1):69. PubMed ID: 36273127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of non-additive genetic effects on carcass and meat quality traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle using genomic models.
Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Lee DH; Chung Y; Lee DJ; Kang JM; Lee SH
Animal; 2024 May; 18(5):101152. PubMed ID: 38701710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of dominance variance in purebred Yorkshire swine.
Culbertson MS; Mabry JW; Misztal I; Gengler N; Bertrand JK; Varona L
J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 9498351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies for additive and dominance effects for body composition traits using 50 K and imputed high-density SNP genotypes in Yunong-black pigs.
Wu Z; Dou T; Bai L; Han J; Yang F; Wang K; Han X; Qiao R; Li XL; Li XJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2024 Mar; 141(2):124-137. PubMed ID: 37822282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models.
Garcia-Baccino CA; Lourenco DAL; Miller S; Cantet RJC; Vitezica ZG
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31867623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle.
Ertl J; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Edel C; Emmerling R; Götz KU
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):40. PubMed ID: 24962065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Haplotype genomic prediction of phenotypic values based on chromosome distance and gene boundaries using low-coverage sequencing in Duroc pigs.
Bian C; Prakapenka D; Tan C; Yang R; Zhu D; Guo X; Liu D; Cai G; Li Y; Liang Z; Wu Z; Da Y; Hu X
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Oct; 53(1):78. PubMed ID: 34620094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation.
Nishio M; Satoh M
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):32. PubMed ID: 25928098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
