178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27623617)
21. Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Additive and Non-Additive Effects on Growth Traits in Duroc Pigs.
Xue Y; Liu S; Li W; Mao R; Zhuo Y; Xing W; Liu J; Wang C; Zhou L; Lei M; Liu J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Feed intake, average daily gain, feed efficiency, and real-time ultrasound traits in Duroc pigs: I. Genetic parameter estimation and accuracy of genomic prediction.
Jiao S; Maltecca C; Gray KA; Cassady JP
J Anim Sci; 2014 Jun; 92(6):2377-86. PubMed ID: 24671579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Investigating the impact of non-additive genetic effects in the estimation of variance components and genomic predictions for heat tolerance and performance traits in crossbred and purebred pig populations.
de Oliveira LF; Brito LF; Marques DBD; da Silva DA; Lopes PS; Dos Santos CG; Johnson JS; Veroneze R
BMC Genom Data; 2023 Dec; 24(1):76. PubMed ID: 38093199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Maternal effects on traits measured during postweaning performance test of swine from four breeds.
Johnson ZB; Chewning JJ; Nugent RA
J Anim Sci; 2002 Jun; 80(6):1470-7. PubMed ID: 12078726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Genetic architecture and major genes for backfat thickness in pig lines of diverse genetic backgrounds.
Gozalo-Marcilla M; Buntjer J; Johnsson M; Batista L; Diez F; Werner CR; Chen CY; Gorjanc G; Mellanby RJ; Hickey JM; Ros-Freixedes R
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):76. PubMed ID: 34551713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimating additive and dominance variances for complex traits in pigs combining genomic and pedigree information.
Costa EV; Diniz DB; Veroneze R; Resende MD; Azevedo CF; Guimaraes SE; Silva FF; Lopes PS
Genet Mol Res; 2015 Jun; 14(2):6303-11. PubMed ID: 26125833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Genome-wide association study and accuracy of genomic prediction for teat number in Duroc pigs using genotyping-by-sequencing.
Tan C; Wu Z; Ren J; Huang Z; Liu D; He X; Prakapenka D; Zhang R; Li N; Da Y; Hu X
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):35. PubMed ID: 28356075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Genomic estimation of additive and dominance effects and impact of accounting for dominance on accuracy of genomic evaluation in sheep populations.
Moghaddar N; van der Werf JHJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Dec; 134(6):453-462. PubMed ID: 28833716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimation of dominance variance for live body weight in a crossbred population of pigs.
Dufrasne M; Faux P; Piedboeuf M; Wavreille J; Gengler N
J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4313-8. PubMed ID: 25149333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A genome-wide association study reveals additive and dominance effects on growth and fatness traits in large white pigs.
Yang W; Wu J; Yu J; Zheng X; Kang H; Wang Z; Zhang S; Zhou L; Liu J
Anim Genet; 2021 Oct; 52(5):749-753. PubMed ID: 34403536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genomic predictions and GWAS for heat tolerance in pigs based on reaction norm models with performance records and data from public weather stations considering alternative temperature thresholds.
Freitas PHF; Johnson JS; Tiezzi F; Huang Y; Schinckel AP; Brito LF
J Anim Breed Genet; 2024 May; 141(3):257-277. PubMed ID: 38009390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Increasing genomic prediction accuracy for unphenotyped full-sib families by modeling additive and dominance effects with large datasets in white spruce.
Nadeau S; Beaulieu J; Gezan SA; Perron M; Bousquet J; Lenz PRN
Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1137834. PubMed ID: 37035077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improvement of prediction ability for genomic selection of dairy cattle by including dominance effects.
Sun C; VanRaden PM; Cole JB; O'Connell JR
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e103934. PubMed ID: 25084281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dissection of additive, dominance, and imprinting effects for production and reproduction traits in Holstein cattle.
Jiang J; Shen B; O'Connell JR; VanRaden PM; Cole JB; Ma L
BMC Genomics; 2017 May; 18(1):425. PubMed ID: 28558656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Parsimonious model for analyzing parent-of-origin effects related to beef traits in dual-purpose Simmental.
Blunk I; Mayer M; Hamann H; Reinsch N
J Anim Sci; 2017 Feb; 95(2):559-571. PubMed ID: 28380611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Genome-wide association studies for seven production traits highlight genomic regions useful to dissect dry-cured ham quality and production traits in Duroc heavy pigs.
Bertolini F; Schiavo G; Galimberti G; Bovo S; D'Andrea M; Gallo M; Buttazzoni L; Rothschild MF; Fontanesi L
Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1777-1784. PubMed ID: 29706143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of nonadditive effects in yearling weight of tropical beef cattle.
Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Vitezica ZG; Reverter A
J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4028-4034. PubMed ID: 30032181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model.
Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3002-7. PubMed ID: 11811453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
