249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27623702)
1. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity.
Hadi MA
Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Update on Scholarly Publication Ethics: Navigating the Confusing Landscape.
Reid C; Cress P
Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Nov; 36(10):1195-1197. PubMed ID: 27329663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):200-201. PubMed ID: 32047304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.
Haug CJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. China cracks down on fake peer reviews.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7659):464. PubMed ID: 28640278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Iranian ministers in plagiarism row.
Butler D
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):578-9. PubMed ID: 19794465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.
Dadkhah M; Kahani M; Borchardt G
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1603-1610. PubMed ID: 28812275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. China's clampdown on fake-paper factories picks up speed.
Else H
Nature; 2021 Oct; 598(7879):19-20. PubMed ID: 34594025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions.
Corbyn Z
Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7418):21. PubMed ID: 23038445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A painful remedy.
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):6. PubMed ID: 21048718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry publication standards of ethical conduct.
Lefebvre CA; Lang BR
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 15798678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Plagiarize or perish?
Ready T
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Without scientific integrity, there can be no evidence base.
Jette AM
Phys Ther; 2005 Nov; 85(11):1122-3. PubMed ID: 16253041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why we should reward peer reviewers.
Maffia P
Cardiovasc Res; 2018 Apr; 114(5):e30-e31. PubMed ID: 29590390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
Check E; Cyranoski D
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Major publisher retracts 43 papers, alleging fake peer review.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1783. PubMed ID: 25832507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific credit and credibility.
Grant PM
Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 12618792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Identity Theft in the Academic World Leads to Junk Science.
Dadkhah M; Lagzian M; Borchardt G
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):287-290. PubMed ID: 28074375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
