184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27623735)
1. The comparison of 5-field conformal radiotherapy techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer: The best for femoral head sparing.
Zare M; Lashkari M; Ghalehtaki R; Ghasemi A; Dehghan Manshadi H; Mir A; Noorollahi S; Alamolhoda M
Med Dosim; 2016 Winter; 41(4):296-299. PubMed ID: 27623735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field.
Milecki P; Piotrowski T; Dymnicka M
Neoplasma; 2004; 51(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15004663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the optimal co-planar field arrangement for use in the boost phase of dose escalated conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.
Khoo VS; Bedford JL; Webb S; Dearnaley DP
Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):177-82. PubMed ID: 11718391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of coplanar four-field techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the prostate.
Bedford JL; Khoo VS; Oldham M; Dearnaley DP; Webb S
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 10435818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing 3-, 4- and 6-fields techniques for conformal irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles using dose-volume histograms.
Fiorino C; Reni M; Cattaneo GM; Bolognesi A; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 1997 Sep; 44(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 9380824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of the oblique angles in the treatment of prostate cancer during six-field conformal radiotherapy.
Pickett B; Roach M; Horine P; Verhey L; Phillips TL
Med Dosim; 1994; 19(4):237-54. PubMed ID: 7893358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison.
De Meerleer GO; Vakaet LA; De Gersem WR; De Wagter C; De Naeyer B; De Neve W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jun; 47(3):639-48. PubMed ID: 10837946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of three-field coplanar plans for conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Khoo VS; Bedford JL; Webb S; Dearnaley DP
Radiother Oncol; 2000 Apr; 55(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 10788686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of treatment techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the prostate using dose-volume histograms and normal tissue complication probabilities.
Neal AJ; Oldham M; Dearnaley DP
Radiother Oncol; 1995 Oct; 37(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8539454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose distribution in 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: comparison of two treatment techniques (six coplanar fields and two dynamic arcs).
Jereczek-Fossa BA; Cattani F; D'Onofrio A; Cambria R; Kowalczyk A; Corallo A; Vavassori A; Zerini D; Ivaldi GB; DeCobelli O; Orecchia R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Dec; 81(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 17113670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of coplanar six-field techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the prostate.
Bedford JL; Khoo VS; Webb S; Dearnaley DP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):231-8. PubMed ID: 10656397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Organ sparing by conformal avoidance intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: dosimetric evaluation of coverage of pelvis and inguinal/femoral nodes.
Chen YJ; Liu A; Tsai PT; Vora NL; Pezner RD; Schultheiss TE; Wong JY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Sep; 63(1):274-81. PubMed ID: 16111597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.
Koontz BF; Das S; Temple K; Bynum S; Catalano S; Koontz JI; Montana GS; Oleson JR
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 19647638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose comparisons for conformal, IMRT and VMAT prostate plans.
Sale C; Moloney P
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Dec; 55(6):611-21. PubMed ID: 22141609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A phase II trial for the optimisation of treatment position in the radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
O'Neill L; Armstrong J; Buckney S; Assiri M; Cannon M; Holmberg O
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18453021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A strategy to correct for intrafraction target translation in conformal prostate radiotherapy: simulation results.
Keall PJ; Lauve AD; Hagan MP; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1944-51. PubMed ID: 17654897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Class solutions for conformal external beam prostate radiotherapy.
Khoo VS; Bedford JL; Webb S; Dearnaley DP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Mar; 55(4):1109-20. PubMed ID: 12605991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improvement of prostate treatment by anterior proton fields.
Tang S; Both S; Bentefour H; Paly JJ; Tochner Z; Efstathiou J; Lu HM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):408-18. PubMed ID: 22133626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
