These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27624313)

  • 21. The correlation between pedestrian injury severity in real-life crashes and Euro NCAP pedestrian test results.
    Strandroth J; Rizzi M; Sternlund S; Lie A; Tingvall C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):604-13. PubMed ID: 22133337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes.
    Fildes B; Keall M; Bos N; Lie A; Page Y; Pastor C; Pennisi L; Rizzi M; Thomas P; Tingvall C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():24-9. PubMed ID: 25935427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comprehensive target populations for current active safety systems using national crash databases.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(7):753-61. PubMed ID: 24433115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A study of the effectiveness of Electronic Stability Control in Canada.
    Chouinard A; Lécuyer JF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jan; 43(1):451-60. PubMed ID: 21094344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimate of safety impact of lane keeping assistant system on fatalities and injuries reduction for China: Scenarios through 2030.
    Tan H; Zhao F; Hao H; Liu Z
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(2):156-162. PubMed ID: 32023126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prevalence of driver physical factors leading to unintentional lane departure crashes.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 27740863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Wisch M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S173-82. PubMed ID: 25307384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intersection AEB implementation strategies for left turn across path crashes.
    Sander U; Lubbe N; Pietzsch S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S119-S125. PubMed ID: 31381448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Injury mitigation estimates for an intersection driver assistance system in straight crossing path crashes in the United States.
    Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S9-S17. PubMed ID: 28323447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Expansion of NASS/CDS for characterizing run-off-road crashes.
    Riexinger LE; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S118-S122. PubMed ID: 32804541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Carroll J; Wisch M; Zander O; Lubbe N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S2-S11. PubMed ID: 26027971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evolution of the crashworthiness and aggressivity of the Spanish car fleet.
    Gómez Méndez A; Aparicio Izquierdo F; Arenas Ramírez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1621-31. PubMed ID: 20728610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating automated emergency braking performance in simulated car-to-two-wheeler crashes in China: A comparison between C-NCAP tests and in-depth crash data.
    Sui B; Lubbe N; Bärgman J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106229. PubMed ID: 34225169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Net-societal and net-private benefits of some existing vehicle crash avoidance technologies.
    Khan A; Harper CD; Hendrickson CT; Samaras C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():207-216. PubMed ID: 30772676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy of roll stability control and lane departure warning systems using carrier-collected data.
    Hickman JS; Guo F; Camden MC; Hanowski RJ; Medina A; Mabry JE
    J Safety Res; 2015 Feb; 52():59-63. PubMed ID: 25662883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Field effectiveness of general motors advanced driver assistance and headlighting systems.
    Leslie AJ; Kiefer RJ; Meitzner MR; Flannagan CA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106275. PubMed ID: 34242861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of speed limit reductions in urban areas on cyclists' injuries in collisions with cars.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Töreki J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup3):39-44. PubMed ID: 31800325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking on rear-end crashes involving pickup trucks.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):293-298. PubMed ID: 36853168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.