160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27624639)
1. The Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Self-Sampling to Improve Routine Cervical Cancer Screening: The Importance of Respondent Screening History and Compliance.
Burger EA; Sy S; Nygård M; Kim JJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Jan; 26(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 27624639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.
Racey CS; Gesink DC; Burchell AN; Trivers S; Wong T; Rebbapragada A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 May; 25(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 26598955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The costs of offering HPV-testing on self-taken samples to non-attendees of cervical screening in Finland.
Virtanen A; Anttila A; Nieminen P
BMC Womens Health; 2015 Nov; 15():99. PubMed ID: 26542953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-sample HPV tests as an intervention for nonattendees of cervical cancer screening in Finland: a randomized trial.
Virtanen A; Nieminen P; Luostarinen T; Anttila A
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Sep; 20(9):1960-9. PubMed ID: 21752985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Utilization of self-sampling kits for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening - pilot study].
Ondryášová H; Koudeláková V; Drábek J; Vaněk P; Slavkovský R; Hajdúch M
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Dec; 80(6):436-43. PubMed ID: 26741158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway.
Burger EA; Ortendahl JD; Sy S; Kristiansen IS; Kim JJ
Br J Cancer; 2012 Apr; 106(9):1571-8. PubMed ID: 22441643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two self-sampling strategies for HPV primary cervical cancer screening compared with clinician-collected sampling: an economic evaluation.
Huntington S; Puri Sudhir K; Schneider V; Sargent A; Turner K; Crosbie EJ; Adams EJ
BMJ Open; 2023 Jun; 13(6):e068940. PubMed ID: 37280031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial.
Lazcano-Ponce E; Lorincz AT; Cruz-Valdez A; Salmerón J; Uribe P; Velasco-Mondragón E; Nevarez PH; Acosta RD; Hernández-Avila M
Lancet; 2011 Nov; 378(9806):1868-73. PubMed ID: 22051739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inefficiencies and High-Value Improvements in U.S. Cervical Cancer Screening Practice: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Kim JJ; Campos NG; Sy S; Burger EA; Cuzick J; Castle PE; Hunt WC; Waxman A; Wheeler CM;
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Oct; 163(8):589-97. PubMed ID: 26414147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: offering a HPV self-test to long-term non-attendees as part of RACOMIP, a Swedish randomized controlled trial.
Broberg G; Gyrd-Hansen D; Miao Jonasson J; Ryd ML; Holtenman M; Milsom I; Strander B
Int J Cancer; 2014 May; 134(9):2223-30. PubMed ID: 24127304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the impact of mailing self-sampling kits for human papillomavirus testing to unscreened non-responder women in Manitoba.
Jalili F; O'Conaill C; Templeton K; Lotocki R; Fischer G; Manning L; Cormier K; Decker K
Curr Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):167-172. PubMed ID: 31285661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emerging role of HPV self-sampling in cervical cancer screening for hard-to-reach women: Focused literature review.
Madzima TR; Vahabi M; Lofters A
Can Fam Physician; 2017 Aug; 63(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 28807952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing participation in cervical screening by targeting long-term nonattenders: Randomized health services study.
Elfström KM; Sundström K; Andersson S; Bzhalava Z; Carlsten Thor A; Gzoul Z; Öhman D; Lamin H; Eklund C; Dillner J; Törnberg S
Int J Cancer; 2019 Dec; 145(11):3033-3039. PubMed ID: 31032904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women: an economic evaluation in a middle-income country.
Vanni T; Luz PM; Grinsztejn B; Veloso VG; Foss A; Mesa-Frias M; Legood R
Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):E96-104. PubMed ID: 21964797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Self-sampling HPV testing versus mainstream cervical screening and HPV testing.
Farnsworth A
Med J Aust; 2016 Mar; 204(5):171. PubMed ID: 26985836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Budget impact of self-testing in the national cervical cancer screening program].
Marchadier A; Leleu H; Barré S
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2023 Jun; 71(3):101838. PubMed ID: 37062157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
Berkhof J; Bogaards JA; Demirel E; Diaz M; Sharma M; Kim JJ
Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 7():H71-9. PubMed ID: 24332299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening.
Meenan RT; Troja C; Buist DSM; Tiro JA; Lin J; Anderson ML; Gao H; Green BB; Winer RL
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e234052. PubMed ID: 36947040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus screening for cervical cancer. A review of recent modelling studies.
Holmes J; Hemmett L; Garfield S
Eur J Health Econ; 2005 Mar; 6(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 15682286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human papillomavirus self-sampling for screening nonattenders: Opt-in pilot implementation with electronic communication platforms.
Lam JU; Rebolj M; Møller Ejegod D; Pedersen H; Rygaard C; Lynge E; Thirstrup Thomsen L; Krüger Kjaer S; Bonde J
Int J Cancer; 2017 May; 140(10):2212-2219. PubMed ID: 28195317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
