135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27624752)
1. Expert judgment and uncertainty regarding the protection of imperiled species.
Heeren A; Karns G; Bruskotter J; Toman E; Wilson R; Szarek H
Conserv Biol; 2017 Jun; 31(3):657-665. PubMed ID: 27624752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision-making for data-deficient species.
Fitzgerald DB; Smith DR; Culver DC; Feller D; Fong DW; Hajenga J; Niemiller ML; Nolfi DC; Orndorff WD; Douglas B; Maloney KO; Young JA
Conserv Biol; 2021 Oct; 35(5):1627-1638. PubMed ID: 33471375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing decision rules for categorizing species' extinction risk to help develop quantitative listing criteria for the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Regan TJ; Taylor BL; Thompson GG; Cochrane JF; Ralls K; Runge MC; Merrick R
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):821-31. PubMed ID: 23646933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The need to rationalize and prioritize threatening processes used to determine threat status in the IUCN Red List.
Hayward MW
Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1568-76. PubMed ID: 19508675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prioritizing Sites for Protection and Restoration for Grizzly Bears (Ursus arctos) in Southwestern Alberta, Canada.
Braid AC; Nielsen SE
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132501. PubMed ID: 26168055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structuring decisions for managing threatened and endangered species in a changing climate.
Gregory R; Arvai J; Gerber LR
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1212-21. PubMed ID: 24299087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attributes of preemptive conservation efforts for species precluded from listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Stanley AE; Epanchin-Niell R; Treakle T; Iacona GD
Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr; 38(2):e14200. PubMed ID: 37817673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hybridization, agency discretion, and implementation of the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Lind-Riehl JF; Mayer AL; Wellstead AM; Gailing O
Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1288-1296. PubMed ID: 27113272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple estimates of effective population size for monitoring a long-lived vertebrate: an application to Yellowstone grizzly bears.
Kamath PL; Haroldson MA; Luikart G; Paetkau D; Whitman C; van Manen FT
Mol Ecol; 2015 Nov; 24(22):5507-21. PubMed ID: 26510936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical habitat for threatened and endangered species: how should the economic costs be evaluated?
Plantinga AJ; Helvoigt TL; Walker K
J Environ Manage; 2014 Feb; 134():127-35. PubMed ID: 24473346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Demographic connectivity for ursid populations at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.
Sawaya MA; Clevenger AP; Kalinowski ST
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):721-30. PubMed ID: 23758532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incorporating climate and ocean change into extinction risk assessments for 82 coral species.
Brainard RE; Weijerman M; Eakin CM; McElhany P; Miller MW; Patterson M; Piniak GA; Dunlap MJ; Birkeland C
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1169-78. PubMed ID: 24299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Climate change, marine environments, and the US Endangered species act.
Seney EE; Rowland MJ; Lowery RA; Griffis RB; McClure MM
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1138-46. PubMed ID: 24299080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of standardized methods to improve extinction-risk classification.
Mothes CC; Clements SL; Hewavithana DK; Howell HJ; David AS; Leventhal ND; Searcy CA
Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):754-761. PubMed ID: 31584211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial patterns of breeding success of grizzly bears derived from hierarchical multistate models.
Fisher JT; Wheatley M; Mackenzie D
Conserv Biol; 2014 Oct; 28(5):1249-59. PubMed ID: 24762089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The importance of expert selection when identifying threatened ecosystems.
Travers SK; Dorrough J; Shannon I; Val J; Scott ML; Moutou CJ; Oliver I
Conserv Biol; 2023 Dec; 37(6):e14151. PubMed ID: 37489269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Confronting uncertainty in wildlife management: performance of grizzly bear management.
Artelle KA; Anderson SC; Cooper AB; Paquet PC; Reynolds JD; Darimont CT
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e78041. PubMed ID: 24223134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of listing the lesser prairie chicken as a threatened species on rural property values.
Wietelman DC; Melstrom RT
J Environ Manage; 2017 Apr; 191():155-161. PubMed ID: 28092751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When experts disagree (and better science won't help much): using structured deliberations to support endangered species recovery planning.
Gregory R; Long G; Colligan M; Geiger JG; Laser M
J Environ Manage; 2012 Aug; 105():30-43. PubMed ID: 22516871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
