190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27624818)
1. The impact of prompt gamma compensation on myocardial blood flow measurements with rubidium-82 dynamic PET.
Armstrong IS; Memmott MJ; Tonge CM; Arumugam P
J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):596-605. PubMed ID: 27624818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blood pool and tissue phase patient motion effects on
Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1918-1929. PubMed ID: 29572594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dependency of cardiac rubidium-82 imaging quantitative measures on age, gender, vascular territory, and software in a cardiovascular normal population.
Sunderland JJ; Pan XB; Declerck J; Menda Y
J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 25294436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient for the identification of coronary artery disease.
Valenta I; Quercioli A; Schindler TH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Apr; 7(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 24631507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of myocardial flow reserve prediction without the use of dynamic data from myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography.
Hashimoto H; Fukushima Y; Kumita SI; Tomiyama T; Kiriyama T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Aug; 34(8):1323-1329. PubMed ID: 29556942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of point spread function modeling and time-of-flight on myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements for rubidium-82 cardiac PET.
Armstrong IS; Tonge CM; Arumugam P
J Nucl Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):467-74. PubMed ID: 24477406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic
Agostini D; Roule V; Nganoa C; Roth N; Baavour R; Parienti JJ; Beygui F; Manrique A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jul; 45(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 29497801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of temporal sampling for
Lee BC; Moody JB; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1517-1529. PubMed ID: 28508271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging.
Farhad H; Dunet V; Bachelard K; Allenbach G; Kaufmann PA; Prior JO
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 23660750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated dynamic motion correction using normalized gradient fields for
Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Murthy VL; Ficaro EP
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1982-1998. PubMed ID: 30406609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simplified quantification of
Chang CY; Hung GU; Hsu B; Yang BH; Chang CW; Hu LH; Huang WS; Wang HE; Wu TC; Liu RS
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):819-828. PubMed ID: 30324328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET.
Murthy VL; Lee BC; Sitek A; Naya M; Moody J; Polavarapu V; Ficaro EP; Di Carli MF
J Nucl Med; 2014 Dec; 55(12):1952-8. PubMed ID: 25429160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility and operator variability of myocardial blood flow and reserve measurements with ⁹⁹mTc-sestamibi quantitative dynamic SPECT/CT imaging.
Klein R; Hung GU; Wu TC; Huang WS; Li D; deKemp RA; Hsu B
J Nucl Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1075-88. PubMed ID: 25280761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the prognostic value of impaired stress myocardial blood flow, myocardial flow reserve, and myocardial flow capacity on low-dose Rubidium-82 SiPM PET/CT.
Dietz M; Kamani CH; Allenbach G; Rubimbura V; Fournier S; Dunet V; Treglia G; Nicod Lalonde M; Schaefer N; Eeckhout E; Muller O; Prior JO
J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1385-1395. PubMed ID: 36574175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internal validation of myocardial flow reserve PET imaging using stress/rest myocardial activity ratios with Rb-82 and N-13-ammonia.
Juneau D; Wu KY; Kaps N; Yao J; Renaud JM; Beanlands RSB; Ruddy TD; deKemp RA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 28(3):835-850. PubMed ID: 33389638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of temporal sampling protocols on myocardial blood flow measurements using Rubidium-82 PET.
Koenders SS; van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Mouden M; Tegelaar AG; Slump CH; van Dalen JA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1729-1741. PubMed ID: 33655444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of SPECT Measurement of Myocardial Blood Flow with Corrections for Attenuation, Motion, and Blood Binding Compared with PET.
Wells RG; Marvin B; Poirier M; Renaud J; deKemp RA; Ruddy TD
J Nucl Med; 2017 Dec; 58(12):2013-2019. PubMed ID: 28611245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between N
Giubbini R; Bertoli M; Durmo R; Bonacina M; Peli A; Faggiano I; Albano D; Milan E; Stern E; Paghera B; Rodella C; Cerudelli E; Gazzilli M; Dondi F; Bertagna F; Camoni L
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1906-1918. PubMed ID: 31728817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Absolute quantitation of myocardial blood flow in human subjects with or without myocardial ischemia using dynamic flurpiridaz F 18 PET.
Packard RR; Huang SC; Dahlbom M; Czernin J; Maddahi J
J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1438-44. PubMed ID: 25071096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
