These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27626225)

  • 1. Rebalancing Spatial Attention: Endogenous Orienting May Partially Overcome the Left Visual Field Bias in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Hasan GS; Verleger R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 29(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 27626225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Leftward bias in orienting to and disengaging attention from salient task-irrelevant events in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Westphal N; Verleger R
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():96-105. PubMed ID: 27916671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bias for the left visual field in rapid serial visual presentation: effects of additional salient cues suggest a critical role of attention.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Asanowicz D; Westphal N; Verleger R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 27(2):266-79. PubMed ID: 25203275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lateralization of spatial rather than temporal attention underlies the left hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Asanowicz D; Kruse L; Śmigasiewicz K; Verleger R
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Nov; 118():54-62. PubMed ID: 28797898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How handedness influences perceptual and attentional processes during rapid serial visual presentation.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Liebrand M; Landmesser J; Verleger R
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jun; 100():155-163. PubMed ID: 28456522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
    Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetries in the covert orienting of visual spatial attention to spatial and non-spatial cues in Alzheimer's disease.
    Maruff P; Malone V; Currie J
    Brain; 1995 Dec; 118 ( Pt 6)():1421-35. PubMed ID: 8595474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deconstructing Reorienting of Attention: Cue Predictiveness Modulates the Inhibition of the No-target Side and the Hemispheric Distribution of the P1 Response to Invalid Targets.
    Doricchi F; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Pinto M; Caratelli L; Cestari V; Rossi-Arnaud C; Lasaponara S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1046-1060. PubMed ID: 31967519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in predictive cuing modulate the hemispheric distribution of the P1 inhibitory response to attentional targets.
    Lasaponara S; D' Onofrio M; Dragone A; Pinto M; Caratelli L; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():156-164. PubMed ID: 28283318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanisms underlying the left visual-field advantage in the dual stream RSVP task: evidence from N2pc, P3, and distractor-evoked VEPs.
    Verleger R; Śmigasiewicz K; Möller F
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1096-106. PubMed ID: 21265863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.
    Chica AB; Sanabria D; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 May; 179(3):353-64. PubMed ID: 17160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
    Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gaze perception induces early attention orienting effects in occipito-parietal regions.
    Ulloa JL; Dubal S; Yahia-Cherif L; George N
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():173-180. PubMed ID: 29269304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The orienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related brain potential study.
    Talsma D; Slagter HA; Nieuwenhuis S; Hage J; Kok A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 15925498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dynamics of shifting visuospatial attention revealed by event-related potentials.
    Nobre AC; Sebestyen GN; Miniussi C
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(7):964-74. PubMed ID: 10775707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two electrophysiological stages of spatial orienting towards fearful faces: early temporo-parietal activation preceding gain control in extrastriate visual cortex.
    Pourtois G; Thut G; Grave de Peralta R; Michel C; Vuilleumier P
    Neuroimage; 2005 May; 26(1):149-63. PubMed ID: 15862215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.