BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27626231)

  • 21. Context-dependent repetition effects on recognition memory.
    Opitz B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Jul; 73(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 20493623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. ERP profiles for face and word recognition are based on their status in semantic memory not their stimulus category.
    Nie A; Griffin M; Keinath A; Walsh M; Dittmann A; Reder L
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1557():66-73. PubMed ID: 24530268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reinstatement of encoding context during recollection: behavioural and neuroimaging evidence of a double dissociation.
    Skinner EI; Manios M; Fugelsang J; Fernandes MA
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 May; 264():51-63. PubMed ID: 24495660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigating the functional interaction between semantic and episodic memory: convergent behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the role of familiarity.
    Greve A; van Rossum MC; Donaldson DI
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jan; 34(2):801-14. PubMed ID: 17112741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Variations in retrieval monitoring during action memory judgments: evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs).
    Leynes PA; Kakadia B
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Feb; 87(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 23313607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Episodic context reinstatement promotes memory retention in older but not younger elementary schoolchildren.
    Ma X; Li T; Li Z; Zhou A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2020 Jun; 38(2):304-318. PubMed ID: 31960469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electrophysiological evidence for late maturation of strategic episodic retrieval processes.
    Sprondel V; Kipp KH; Mecklinger A
    Dev Sci; 2012 May; 15(3):330-44. PubMed ID: 22490174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in time-based prospective memory task monitoring: An EEG analysis of brain sources using Independent Component and Measure Projection Analysis.
    Cruz G; Burgos P; Kilborn K; Evans JJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184037. PubMed ID: 28863146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Study-test congruency affects encoding-related brain activity for some but not all stimulus materials.
    Bauch EM; Otten LJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Jan; 24(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 21671740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Timing matters: age-related changes in episodic retrieval control as revealed by event-related potentials.
    Sprondel V; Kipp KH; Mecklinger A
    Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1537():143-55. PubMed ID: 24041773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Active retrieval facilitates across-episode binding by modulating the content of memory.
    Bridge DJ; Voss JL
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():154-64. PubMed ID: 25173711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Litmus test of rich episodic representations: Context-induced false recognition.
    Szőllősi Á; Pajkossy P; Bencze D; Marián M; Racsmány M
    Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105287. PubMed ID: 36156388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distinguishing source memory and item memory: brain potentials at encoding and retrieval.
    Guo C; Duan L; Li W; Paller KA
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1118(1):142-54. PubMed ID: 16978588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retrieval Goal Modulates Memory for Context.
    Elward RL; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 27(12):2529-40. PubMed ID: 26351995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Temporal-pattern similarity analysis reveals the beneficial and detrimental effects of context reinstatement on human memory.
    Staudigl T; Vollmar C; Noachtar S; Hanslmayr S
    J Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 35(13):5373-84. PubMed ID: 25834061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neurophysiological correlates of memory illusion in both encoding and retrieval phases.
    Geng H; Qi Y; Li Y; Fan S; Wu Y; Zhu Y
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):154-68. PubMed ID: 17239833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Δ
    Doss MK; Weafer J; Gallo DA; de Wit H
    Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging; 2020 Jan; 5(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 31668830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Novelty's effect on memory encoding.
    Rangel-Gomez M; Janenaite S; Meeter M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():14-21. PubMed ID: 26005196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electrophysiological correlates of competitor activation predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Hellerstedt R; Johansson M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Jun; 24(6):1619-29. PubMed ID: 23365212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pattern reactivation co-varies with activity in the core recollection network during source memory.
    Leiker EK; Johnson JD
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():88-98. PubMed ID: 26004057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.