194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27626908)
1. Interacting with GPCRs: Using Interaction Fingerprints for Virtual Screening.
Lenselink EB; Jespers W; van Vlijmen HW; IJzerman AP; van Westen GJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Oct; 56(10):2053-2060. PubMed ID: 27626908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular interaction fingerprint approaches for GPCR drug discovery.
Vass M; Kooistra AJ; Ritschel T; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 30():59-68. PubMed ID: 27479316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structure-Based Prediction of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Ligand Function: A β-Adrenoceptor Case Study.
Kooistra AJ; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 May; 55(5):1045-61. PubMed ID: 25848966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of molecular dynamics sampling on the performance of virtual screening against GPCRs.
Tarcsay A; Paragi G; Vass M; Jójárt B; Bogár F; Keserű GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):2990-9. PubMed ID: 24116387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency of Homology Modeling Assisted Molecular Docking in G-protein Coupled Receptors.
Bhunia SS; Saxena AK
Curr Top Med Chem; 2021; 21(4):269-294. PubMed ID: 32901584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A benchmarking study on virtual ligand screening against homology models of human GPCRs.
Lim VJY; Du W; Chen YZ; Fan H
Proteins; 2018 Sep; 86(9):978-989. PubMed ID: 30051928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.
Coudrat T; Simms J; Christopoulos A; Wootten D; Sexton PM
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005819. PubMed ID: 29131821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Receptor-ligand docking simulation for membrane proteins].
Hirokawa T
Yakugaku Zasshi; 2007 Jan; 127(1):123-31. PubMed ID: 17202792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method.
Kooistra AJ; Vischer HF; McNaught-Flores D; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28288. PubMed ID: 27339552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do crystal structures obviate the need for theoretical models of GPCRs for structure-based virtual screening?
Tang H; Wang XS; Hsieh JH; Tropsha A
Proteins; 2012 Jun; 80(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 22275072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discovery of GPCR Ligands by Molecular Docking Screening: Novel Opportunities Provided by Crystal Structures.
Rodríguez D; Ranganathan A; Carlsson J
Curr Top Med Chem; 2015; 15(24):2484-503. PubMed ID: 26126906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Towards predictive docking at aminergic G-protein coupled receptors.
Jakubík J; El-Fakahany EE; Doležal V
J Mol Model; 2015 Nov; 21(11):284. PubMed ID: 26453085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methods for Virtual Screening of GPCR Targets: Approaches and Challenges.
Cross JB
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():233-264. PubMed ID: 29188566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtual Screening of Human Class-A GPCRs Using Ligand Profiles Built on Multiple Ligand-Receptor Interactions.
Chan WKB; Zhang Y
J Mol Biol; 2020 Aug; 432(17):4872-4890. PubMed ID: 32652079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Docking and Virtual Screening Strategies for GPCR Drug Discovery.
Beuming T; Lenselink B; Pala D; McRobb F; Repasky M; Sherman W
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1335():251-76. PubMed ID: 26260606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atom-centered interacting fragments and similarity search applications.
Batista J; Tan L; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jan; 50(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 20030298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recent advances in structure-based virtual screening of G-protein coupled receptors.
Ananthan S; Zhang W; Hobrath JV
AAPS J; 2009 Mar; 11(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 19291412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing GPCR homology models constructed from templates of various transmembrane sequence identities: Binding mode prediction and docking enrichment.
Loo JSE; Emtage AL; Ng KW; Yong ASJ; Doughty SW
J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Mar; 80():38-47. PubMed ID: 29306746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of virtual screening against GPCR homology models: Impact of template selection and treatment of binding site plasticity.
Jaiteh M; Rodríguez-Espigares I; Selent J; Carlsson J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1007680. PubMed ID: 32168319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current assessment of docking into GPCR crystal structures and homology models: successes, challenges, and guidelines.
Beuming T; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Dec; 52(12):3263-77. PubMed ID: 23121495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
