These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Which fetal growth charts should be used? A retrospective observational study in China. Zhao J; Yuan Y; Tao J; Chen C; Wu X; Liao Y; Wu L; Zeng Q; Chen Y; Wang K; Li X; Liu Z; Zhou J; Zhou Y; Li S; Zhu J Chin Med J (Engl); 2022 Aug; 135(16):1969-1977. PubMed ID: 36070466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrauterine growth patterns in rural Ethiopia compared with WHO and INTERGROWTH-21st growth standards: A community-based longitudinal study. Roro M; Deressa W; Lindtjørn B PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226881. PubMed ID: 31891599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval. Reboul Q; Delabaere A; Luo ZC; Nuyt AM; Wu Y; Chauleur C; Fraser W; Audibert F Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal biometry assessment with Intergrowth 21st's and Salomon's equations in rural Burkina Faso. Bihoun B; Zango SH; Traoré-Coulibaly M; Valea I; Ravinetto R; Van Geertruyden JP; D'Alessandro U; Tinto H; Robert A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Aug; 20(1):492. PubMed ID: 32847549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Grantz KL; Hediger ML; Liu D; Buck Louis GM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S641-S655.e28. PubMed ID: 29275821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30-34 weeks. Bakalis S; Silva M; Akolekar R; Poon LC; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 25523866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards. Kabiri D; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Hernandez-Andrade E; Pacora P; Benshalom-Tirosh N; Tirosh D; Yeo L; Erez O; Hassan SS; Tarca AL Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of Reference Charts for Mid-Trimester Fetal Biometry. van de Kamp K; Pajkrt E; Zwinderman AH; van der Post JA; Snijders RJM Fetal Diagn Ther; 2019; 45(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 29533928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Third-Trimester Fetal Biometry and Neonatal Outcomes in Term and Preterm Deliveries. Sheth T; Glantz JC J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 26643756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of estimated fetal weight percentiles near term for predicting extremes of birthweight percentile. Sovio U; Smith GCS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 224(3):292.e1-292.e19. PubMed ID: 32835717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study. Tarca AL; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Erez O; Hernandez-Andrade E; Yeo L; Bhatti G; Pacora P; Maymon E; Hassan SS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S679-S691.e4. PubMed ID: 29422207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]