These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27627787)

  • 21. Rangeland Condition Monitoring: A New Approach Using Cross-Fence Comparisons of Remotely Sensed Vegetation.
    Kilpatrick AD; Lewis MM; Ostendorf B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142742. PubMed ID: 26565801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of Remote Sensing Data for Locust Research and Management-A Review.
    Klein I; Oppelt N; Kuenzer C
    Insects; 2021 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 33803360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative Comparison of UAS-Borne LiDAR Systems for High-Resolution Forested Wetland Mapping.
    Pricope NG; Halls JN; Mapes KL; Baxley JB; Wu JJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Aug; 20(16):. PubMed ID: 32784984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Submerged aquatic vegetation: Overview of monitoring techniques used for the identification and determination of spatial distribution in European coastal waters.
    Lønborg C; Thomasberger A; Staehr PAU; Stockmarr A; Sengupta S; Rasmussen ML; Nielsen LT; Hansen LB; Timmermann K
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2022 Jun; 18(4):892-908. PubMed ID: 34750976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marine environmental monitoring with unmanned vehicle platforms: Present applications and future prospects.
    Yuan S; Li Y; Bao F; Xu H; Yang Y; Yan Q; Zhong S; Yin H; Xu J; Huang Z; Lin J
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Feb; 858(Pt 1):159741. PubMed ID: 36349622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Managing plant invasions through the lens of remote sensing: A review of progress and the way forward.
    Vaz AS; Alcaraz-Segura D; Campos JC; Vicente JR; Honrado JP
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Nov; 642():1328-1339. PubMed ID: 30045513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Advances in animal ecology from 3D-LiDAR ecosystem mapping.
    Davies AB; Asner GP
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Dec; 29(12):681-91. PubMed ID: 25457158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A novel approach to model exposure of coastal-marine ecosystems to riverine flood plumes based on remote sensing techniques.
    Álvarez-Romero JG; Devlin M; Teixeira da Silva E; Petus C; Ban NC; Pressey RL; Kool J; Roberts JJ; Cerdeira-Estrada S; Wenger AS; Brodie J
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Apr; 119():194-207. PubMed ID: 23500022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection and prediction of lake degradation using landscape metrics and remote sensing dataset.
    Azareh A; Sardooi ER; Gholami H; Mosavi A; Shahdadi A; Barkhori S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jun; 28(21):27283-27298. PubMed ID: 33507510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Remote sensing of land degradation: experiences from Latin America and the Caribbean.
    Metternicht G; Zinck JA; Blanco PD; del Valle HF
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(1):42-61. PubMed ID: 20048293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using LiDAR technology in forestry activities.
    Akay AE; Oğuz H; Karas IR; Aruga K
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Apr; 151(1-4):117-25. PubMed ID: 18365761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automated mapping of
    Galuszynski NC; Duker R; Potts AJ; Kattenborn T
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14219. PubMed ID: 36262418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Remote sensing of soil degradation: introduction.
    Lobell DB
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20048288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Remote sensing of ecology, biodiversity and conservation: a review from the perspective of remote sensing specialists.
    Wang K; Franklin SE; Guo X; Cattet M
    Sensors (Basel); 2010; 10(11):9647-67. PubMed ID: 22163432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integrated risk and recovery monitoring of ecosystem restorations on contaminated sites.
    Hooper MJ; Glomb SJ; Harper DD; Hoelzle TB; McIntosh LM; Mulligan DR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Apr; 12(2):284-95. PubMed ID: 26465231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scaling up functional traits for ecosystem services with remote sensing: concepts and methods.
    Abelleira Martínez OJ; Fremier AK; Günter S; Ramos Bendaña Z; Vierling L; Galbraith SM; Bosque-Pérez NA; Ordoñez JC
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Jul; 6(13):4359-71. PubMed ID: 27386081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. EcoAnthromes of Alberta: An example of disturbance-informed ecological regionalization using remote sensing.
    Kearney SP; Coops NC; Stenhouse GB; Nelson TA
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Mar; 234():297-310. PubMed ID: 30634122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantitative remote sensing of forest ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa's urban landscapes: a review.
    Mngadi M; Odindi J; Mutanga O; Sibanda M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Mar; 194(4):242. PubMed ID: 35243559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monitoring of the mercury mining site Almadén implementing remote sensing technologies.
    Schmid T; Rico C; Rodríguez-Rastrero M; José Sierra M; Javier Díaz-Puente F; Pelayo M; Millán R
    Environ Res; 2013 Aug; 125():92-102. PubMed ID: 23499516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Integrating drone imagery with existing rangeland monitoring programs.
    Gillan JK; Karl JW; van Leeuwen WJD
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Apr; 192(5):269. PubMed ID: 32253518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.