142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2762812)
1. New rules on misconduct.
Holden C
Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):593. PubMed ID: 2762812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An end to fraud?
Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The fraud case that evaporated.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Appeals panel reverses fraud finding.
Fackelmann K
Sci News; 1996 Jul; 150(1):4. PubMed ID: 11654356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific reasoning and due process.
Guenin LM; Davis BD
Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Jan; 2(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11657786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Findings of scientific misconduct; notice.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary
Fed Regist; 1993 Jun; 58(117):33830-2. PubMed ID: 11645231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower.
Poon P
J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research, misconduct and Congress.
Palca J
Nature; 1989 Feb; 337(6207):503. PubMed ID: 2915700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Office of scientific integrity.
Mason JO
Science; 1989 May; 244(4907):903-4. PubMed ID: 2543069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Innovation and integrity in biomedical research.
Jasanoff S
Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 69(9 Suppl):S91-5. PubMed ID: 11652808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The fraud squad.
Greenberg D
Lancet; 1990 Jan; 335(8682):155-6. PubMed ID: 1967443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.
US Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct. Investigations on trial in a Texas court.
Marshall E
Science; 1999 Feb; 283(5404):913-4. PubMed ID: 10075554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
Palca J
Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.
Pascal CB
Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A judgement fit for prime time.
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
