These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2762812)

  • 21. Spring helps research integrity report resurface.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Misconduct charges dropped against AIDS virus scientist.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():1, 11. PubMed ID: 11647009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
    Wright DE
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Science needs vigilance not vigilantes.
    Woolf PK
    JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1939-40. PubMed ID: 3418857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Dingell probe finally goes public.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4905):643, 645-6. PubMed ID: 2655086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Responding to scientific misconduct. Due process and prevention.
    Mishkin B
    JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1932-6. PubMed ID: 3418855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
    Steinberg NA
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Star chambers will result in injustice.
    Kevles DJ
    Nature; 1998 Sep; 395(6700):317. PubMed ID: 11645104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. American scientist who found H.I.V. is investigated anew.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A1, B9. PubMed ID: 11646925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Baltimore dispute.
    Sibbison JB
    Lancet; 1989 May; 1(8647):1148-9. PubMed ID: 2566100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scientific misconduct. HHS is still looking for a definition.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5269):1735. PubMed ID: 8650565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The American experience: lessons learned.
    Rhoades LJ
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 11273443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
    Steele F
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scientific fraud. New public health service policy.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1986 Jun 26-Jul 2; 321(6073):804. PubMed ID: 3724839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scientific misconduct investigations: who should conduct them?
    Klein DF
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5034):918. PubMed ID: 1948072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Falsifying data is main problem in US research fraud review.
    Pownall M
    BMJ; 1999 May; 318(7192):1164. PubMed ID: 10221931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dingell rips Healy for 'obstructionism'.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1992 Dec; 258(5089):1729. PubMed ID: 1465608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Commission proposes new definition of misconduct.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1995 Sep; 269(5232):1811. PubMed ID: 7569910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.