These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27629019)

  • 1. Haemodynamic of blood flow through stenotic aortic valve.
    Sadeghpour F; Fatouraee N; Navidbakhsh M
    J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 27629019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration.
    Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bicuspid aortic valves undergo excessive strain during opening: a simulation study.
    Katayama S; Umetani N; Hisada T; Sugiura S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Jun; 145(6):1570-6. PubMed ID: 22698558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direction and magnitude of blood flow shear stresses on the leaflets of aortic valves: is there a link with valve calcification?
    Ge L; Sotiropoulos F
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Jan; 132(1):014505. PubMed ID: 20524753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve.
    De Hart J; Peters GW; Schreurs PJ; Baaijens FP
    J Biomech; 2003 Jan; 36(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 12485644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biomechanical model of the pathological aortic valve: simulation of aortic stenosis.
    Loureiro-Ga M; Veiga C; Fdez-Manin G; Jimenez VA; Calvo-Iglesias F; Iñiguez A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):303-311. PubMed ID: 31996041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluid structure interaction modelling of aortic valve stenosis: Effects of valve calcification on coronary artery flow and aortic root hemodynamics.
    Kivi AR; Sedaghatizadeh N; Cazzolato BS; Zander AC; Roberts-Thomson R; Nelson AJ; Arjomandi M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105647. PubMed ID: 32688138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental technique of measuring dynamic fluid shear stress on the aortic surface of the aortic valve leaflet.
    Yap CH; Saikrishnan N; Tamilselvan G; Yoganathan AP
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jun; 133(6):061007. PubMed ID: 21744927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physiological basis of flow dependence of Gorlin formula valve area in aortic stenosis: analysis using an hydraulic model of pulsatile flow.
    Rifkin RD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):740-51. PubMed ID: 11128779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatiotemporal Complexity of the Aortic Sinus Vortex as a Function of Leaflet Calcification.
    Hatoum H; Dasi LP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Apr; 47(4):1116-1128. PubMed ID: 30710186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of calcific aortic valve disease using patient-specific three-dimensional calcification scans.
    Halevi R; Hamdan A; Marom G; Lavon K; Ben-Zekry S; Raanani E; Bluestein D; Haj-Ali R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Nov; 54(11):1683-1694. PubMed ID: 26906280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the opening mechanism of the aortic valve: some observations from simulations.
    Howard IC; Patterson EA; Yoxall A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2003; 27(6):259-66. PubMed ID: 14602517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of stenotic valve geometry on measured pressure gradients and ventricular work: the relationship between morphology and flow.
    Cape EG; Kelly DL; Ettedgui JA; Park SC
    Pediatr Cardiol; 1996; 17(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 8662024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A multiscale computational comparison of the bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in relation to calcific aortic stenosis.
    Weinberg EJ; Kaazempur Mofrad MR
    J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3482-7. PubMed ID: 18996528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of pulsatile flow within a layered and stenotic aorta.
    Liu ZQ; Liu Y; Liu TT; Yang QS
    Mol Cell Biomech; 2014 Jun; 11(2):129-49. PubMed ID: 25993747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Doppler echocardiography determination of the orifice area in aortic valve stenosis using a continuity equation].
    Dennig K; Kraus F; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Dec; 11(6):309-17. PubMed ID: 3817722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic valve replacement reduces valvuloarterial impedance but does not affect systemic arterial compliance in elderly men with degenerative calcific trileaflet aortic valve stenosis.
    Pagel PS; Schroeder AR; De Vry DJ; Hudetz JA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1540-4. PubMed ID: 25267695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of pressure recovery location in aortic valve stenosis: an in-vitro validation study.
    Rhodes KD; Stroml JA; Rahman MM; VanAuker MD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Sep; 16(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 17944120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemodynamic characterization of calcified stenotic human aortic valves before and after treatment with a novel aortic valve repair system.
    Ohashi KL; Culkar J; Riebman JB; Estes M; Constantz BR; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Jul; 13(4):582-92; discussion 592. PubMed ID: 15311864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical simulation of steady turbulent flow through trileaflet aortic heart valves--II. Results on five models.
    Stevenson DM; Yoganathan AP; Williams FP
    J Biomech; 1985; 18(12):909-26. PubMed ID: 4077859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.