402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27629239)
41. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. New technology in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Rassweiler J; Rassweiler MC; Klein J
Curr Opin Urol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 26626887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Endoscopic management of urolithiasis in the morbidly obese patient.
Nguyen TA; Belis JA
J Endourol; 1998 Feb; 12(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 9531148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Surgical management of urolithiasis in spinal cord injury patients.
Nabbout P; Slobodov G; Culkin DJ
Curr Urol Rep; 2014 Jun; 15(6):408. PubMed ID: 24740271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Surgical Stone Trends from 2013 to 2021 in the US Medicare Population: Before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Serrell E; Antar AS; Buinevicius E; Li S; Haas C; Knoedler M; Gralnek D; Penniston KL; Nakada SY
J Endourol; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38874511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Pediatric urolithiasis: the current surgical management.
Straub M; Gschwend J; Zorn C
Pediatr Nephrol; 2010 Jul; 25(7):1239-44. PubMed ID: 20130924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy in children: evolutions.
Long CJ; Srinivasan AK
Urol Clin North Am; 2015 Feb; 42(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 25455168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of kidney stones in patients with a solitary kidney.
Yuruk E; Binbay M; Ozgor F; Sekerel L; Berberoglu Y; Muslumanoglu AY
J Endourol; 2015 Apr; 29(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 25268731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Shockwave lithotripsy and endourological management of urinary calculi in children: a single-center 10-year experience.
Charalambous S; Printza N; Papathanasiou A; Rombis V; Goga Ch; Papachristou F
J Endourol; 2008 Sep; 22(9):2169-74. PubMed ID: 18811575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: is it still valid in the era of robotic endourology? Can it be more efficient?
Rassweiler J; Rieker P; Rassweiler-Seyfried MC
Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 31990816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Surgical Trends in Nephrolithiasis: Increasing
Metzler IS; Holt S; Harper JD
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):769-774. PubMed ID: 33430693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Treatment alternatives for urinary system stone disease in preschool aged children: results of 616 cases.
Sen H; Seckiner I; Bayrak O; Erturhan S; Demirbağ A
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Feb; 11(1):34.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25697981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Current trends and pitfalls in endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis.
Inoue T; Okada S; Hamamoto S; Yoshida T; Matsuda T
Int J Urol; 2018 Feb; 25(2):121-133. PubMed ID: 29136679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evidence-based management of upper tract urolithiasis in the spinal cord-injured patient.
Ramsey S; McIlhenny C
Spinal Cord; 2011 Sep; 49(9):948-54. PubMed ID: 21625238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Critical prospective appraisal of renal morphology and function in children undergoing shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Wadhwa P; Aron M; Bal CS; Dhanpatty B; Gupta NP
J Endourol; 2007 Sep; 21(9):961-6. PubMed ID: 17941769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones?
Muslumanoglu AY; Karadag MA; Tefekli AH; Altunrende F; Tok A; Berberoglu Y
Int J Urol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1385-8. PubMed ID: 17083388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Determinants of health-related quality of life for patients after urinary lithotripsy: ureteroscopic vs. shock wave lithotripsy.
Hamamoto S; Unno R; Taguchi K; Naiki T; Ando R; Okada A; Inoue T; Okada S; AbdelRazek M; Kohri K; Yasui T;
Urolithiasis; 2018 Apr; 46(2):203-210. PubMed ID: 28357452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches to the management of large upper ureteral stones after shockwave lithotripsy failure: a four-year retrospective study.
Zhu H; Ye X; Xiao X; Chen X; Zhang Q; Wang H
J Endourol; 2014 Jan; 28(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 23914784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Trends in urological stone disease.
Turney BW; Reynard JM; Noble JG; Keoghane SR
BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109(7):1082-7. PubMed ID: 21883851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.
Tokas T; Habicher M; Junker D; Herrmann T; Jessen JP; Knoll T; Nagele U;
World J Urol; 2017 Jun; 35(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 27738806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
