479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27629427)
1. State of the art in non-animal approaches for skin sensitization testing: from individual test methods towards testing strategies.
Ezendam J; Braakhuis HM; Vandebriel RJ
Arch Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 90(12):2861-2883. PubMed ID: 27629427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The THP-1 cell toolbox: a new concept integrating the key events of skin sensitization.
Clouet E; Bechara R; Raffalli C; Damiens MH; Groux H; Pallardy M; Ferret PJ; Kerdine-Römer S
Arch Toxicol; 2019 Apr; 93(4):941-951. PubMed ID: 30806763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting Chemically Induced Skin Sensitization by Using In Chemico / In Vitro Methods.
Rossi LH; Ezendam J
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():485-504. PubMed ID: 29934907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The 21st Century movement within the area of skin sensitization assessment: From the animal context towards current human-relevant in vitro solutions.
de Ávila RI; Lindstedt M; Valadares MC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Nov; 108():104445. PubMed ID: 31430506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.
Strickland J; Zang Q; Kleinstreuer N; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Lowit A; Allen D; Casey W
J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1150-62. PubMed ID: 26851134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. State-of-the-art and new options to assess T cell activation by skin sensitizers: Cosmetics Europe Workshop.
van Vliet E; Kühnl J; Goebel C; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Alépée N; Ashikaga T; Blömeke B; Del Bufalo A; Cluzel M; Corsini E; Delrue N; Desprez B; Gellatly N; Giese C; Gribaldo L; Hoffmann S; Klaric M; Maillere B; Naisbitt D; Pallardy M; Vocanson M; Petersohn D
ALTEX; 2018; 35(2):179-192. PubMed ID: 28968481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current limitations and future opportunities for prediction of DILI from in vitro.
Funk C; Roth A
Arch Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 91(1):131-142. PubMed ID: 27766365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of in vitro assays for the assessment of the skin sensitization hazard of functional polysiloxanes and silanes.
Petry T; Bosch A; Coste X; Eigler D; Germain P; Seidel S; Jean PA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Mar; 84():64-76. PubMed ID: 28017767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin sensitizing effects of sulfur mustard and other alkylating agents in accordance to OECD guidelines.
Steinritz D; Lang S; Popp T; Siegert M; Rothmiller S; Kranawetvogl A; Schmidt A; John H; Gudermann T; Thiermann H; Kehe K
Toxicol Lett; 2019 Oct; 314():172-180. PubMed ID: 31404593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of skin sensitization based on interleukin-2 promoter activation in Jurkat cells.
Nagahata T; Tsujino Y; Takayama E; Hikasa H; Satoh A
Biomed Rep; 2022 Jan; 16(1):3. PubMed ID: 34820126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of substances found positive in 1 of 3 in vitro tests for skin sensitization.
Kolle SN; Natsch A; Gerberick GF; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Aug; 106():352-368. PubMed ID: 31112722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of a defined approach based on a stacking prediction model to identify skin sensitization hazard.
Tourneix F; Alépée N; Detroyer A; Eilstein J; Martinozzi Teissier S; Nardelli L; Noçairi H; Pauloin T; Piroird C; Del Bufalo A
Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Oct; 60():134-143. PubMed ID: 31100378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches
Kleinstreuer NC; Hoffmann S; Alépée N; Allen D; Ashikaga T; Casey W; Clouet E; Cluzel M; Desprez B; Gellatly N; Göbel C; Kern PS; Klaric M; Kühnl J; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Strickland J; van Vliet E; Zang Q; Petersohn D
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 May; 48(5):359-374. PubMed ID: 29474122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Probabilistic hazard assessment for skin sensitization potency by dose-response modeling using feature elimination instead of quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Luechtefeld T; Maertens A; McKim JM; Hartung T; Kleensang A; Sá-Rocha V
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1361-1371. PubMed ID: 26046447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the performance of integrated approaches for hazard identification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
van der Veen JW; Rorije E; Emter R; Natsch A; van Loveren H; Ezendam J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 24813372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanistic understanding of dendritic cell activation in skin sensitization: additional evidences to support potency classification.
Galbiati V; Marinovich M; Corsini E
Toxicol Lett; 2020 Apr; 322():50-57. PubMed ID: 31958493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconstructed human epidermis-based testing strategy of skin sensitization potential and potency classification using epidermal sensitization assay and in silico data.
Mizumachi H; Suzuki S; Sakuma M; Natsui M; Imai N; Miyazawa M
J Appl Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 44(3):415-427. PubMed ID: 37846211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrimination of skin sensitizers from non-sensitizers by interleukin-1α and interleukin-6 production on cultured human keratinocytes.
Jung D; Che JH; Lim KM; Chun YJ; Heo Y; Seok SH
J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1129-36. PubMed ID: 26691653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Models of Dendritic Cells to Assess Skin Sensitization.
Hardonnière K; Szely N; El Ali Z; Pallardy M; Kerdine-Römer S
Front Toxicol; 2022; 4():851017. PubMed ID: 35373185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
