These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27630186)

  • 1. Occurrence and diversity of both bacterial and fungal communities in dental unit waterlines subjected to disinfectants.
    Costa D; Mercier A; Gravouil K; Lesobre J; Verdon J; Imbert C
    Pathog Dis; 2016 Oct; 74(7):. PubMed ID: 27630186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in dental unit waterlines.
    Costa D; Mercier A; Gravouil K; Lesobre J; Delafont V; Bousseau A; Verdon J; Imbert C
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 81():223-31. PubMed ID: 26072020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of dental unit waterlines disinfectants on a polymicrobial biofilm.
    Costa D; Girardot M; Bertaux J; Verdon J; Imbert C
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():38-44. PubMed ID: 26773487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planktonic free-living amoebae susceptibility to dental unit waterlines disinfectants.
    Costa D; Bossard V; Brunet K; Fradin B; Imbert C
    Pathog Dis; 2017 Nov; 75(8):. PubMed ID: 28911034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of dental unit disinfectants against Candida spp. and Hartmannella vermiformis.
    Barbot V; Costa D; Deborde M; Imbert C
    Pathog Dis; 2014 Apr; 70(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 24391018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chlorine-based DUWL disinfectant leads to a different microbial composition of water derived biofilms compared to H
    Zemouri C; Laheij AMGA; Volgenant CMC; Brandt BW; Crielaard W; Buijs MJ; Zaura E; de Soet JJ
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9503. PubMed ID: 32742792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of microbial profile in dental unit waterlines and assessment of antimicrobial efficacy of two treating agents.
    Mungara J; Dilna NC; Joseph E; Reddy N
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 24046983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A between-patient disinfection method to control water line contamination and biofilm inside dental units.
    Montebugnoli L; Chersoni S; Prati C; Dolci G
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Apr; 56(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 15066741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do contaminated dental unit waterlines pose a risk of infection?
    Pankhurst CL; Coulter WA
    J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):712-20. PubMed ID: 17689168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines.
    Szymańska J; Sitkowska J; Dutkiewicz J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2008; 15(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 19061251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Formation and decontamination of biofilms in dental unit waterlines.
    Wirthlin MR; Marshall GW; Rowland RW
    J Periodontol; 2003 Nov; 74(11):1595-609. PubMed ID: 14682656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disinfection methods of dental unit waterlines contamination: a systematic review.
    Wu M; Shi Z; Yu X; Xu Y; Jin X; Zhang L; Fu B
    J Med Microbiol; 2022 Jun; 71(6):. PubMed ID: 35670283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: tap water versus distilled water.
    Kettering JD; Stephens JA; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Aug; 3(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 12239573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bacterial decontamination of DUWL biofilm using Oxygenal 6.
    Szymańska J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 16841887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of dental unit waterline biofilms in the 21st century.
    O'Donnell MJ; Boyle MA; Russell RJ; Coleman DC
    Future Microbiol; 2011 Oct; 6(10):1209-26. PubMed ID: 22004039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Susceptibility of bacteria isolated from dental unit waterlines to disinfecting chemical agents.
    Yoon HY; Lee SY
    J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 64(6):269-275. PubMed ID: 29848913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of BRS
    Baudet A; Lizon J; Martrette JM; Camelot F; Florentin A; Clément C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 32290533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concentration and species composition of aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria released to the air of a dental operation area before and after disinfection of dental unit waterlines.
    Szymańska J; Dutkiewicz J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2008; 15(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 19061267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of cleaning regimes on dental water unit contamination.
    Abdallah SA; Khalil AI
    J Water Health; 2011 Dec; 9(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 22048424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dental unit waterlines: review and product evaluation.
    Panagakos FS; Lassiter T; Kumar E
    J N J Dent Assoc; 2001; 72(2):20-5, 38. PubMed ID: 11484611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.